Guys, please take notice of this draft: * Clint, I made some changes to the SPI, hope it's not too disruptive! * Pete, check the stuff about dependent objects, please, I want to know that it's not still broken ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; Date: Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM Subject: Draft To: Java Community Process JSR #299 Expert List <JSR-299-EG(a)jcp.org&gt; OK, I did some work over the long weekend: Extension SPI +++++++++++ Now has a more consistently layered architecture, and accommodates session beans properly. This involved: * splitting Producer out of InjectionTarget and adding Listener * adding SessionBean and BeanClass (containing common operations of SessionBean and ManagedBean) * adding setInjectionTarget() / setProducer() / setListener() on XxxxxBeans * adding getXxxxBean() to ProcessXxxxxBean() I think this is a big improvement, even though it involves a couple of extra interfaces, but see for yourself :-) Dependent object destruction ++++++++++++++++++++++ I've also included my proposal for fixing dependent object destruction. The proposed changes are in the following sections: * 5.5.2, * 6.1 - 6.2 * 6.4.1-6.4.3 This is a significant change to SPIs (6.1-6.2) and a slight change to user-visible behavior (5.5.2), so *please* review this thoroughly. I do not enjoy making a change like this so late in the process. Conversation exceptions +++++++++++++++++++ I've added NonexistentConversationException and BusyConversationException in 6.7.4. Please review. @Observes +++++++++ Finally, I've rolled in the proposed changes to @Observes. Please check that you're OK with this. -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org