Cos it's correct. Bean<X> would not be correct :-)
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi
Any reason the signature has the (hard to use) return type of Bean<? extends
X>, not just Bean<X>?
P
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org