1:45 p.m.
Should we say that any bean that is specialized by an enabled bean is
disabled - i.e. no Bean object exists? Or should we leave it like it
is now?
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
2:36 a.m.
What happens if you have a @SessionScoped bean in an EAR lib which is @Specializes in 2
different WebApps within this EAR but not in a 3rd one?
Might get tricky if we drop the original bean, isn't?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 8/24/09, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [webbeans-dev] which would be easier to implement?
To: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>, "WebBeans"
<webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 8:45 PM
Should we say that any bean that is
specialized by an enabled bean is
disabled - i.e. no Bean object exists? Or should we leave
it like it
is now?
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
7:15 a.m.
Implementation wise, I'm not sure it makes any difference, as you
still need to know what bean specializes what. Further, you can cache
the result of a resolve(), so there is no performance overhead at
runtime.
Conceptually, I think it works better as is, and I think Mark makes a
valid point.
Mark, any comment on impl for OWB?
On 25 Aug 2009, at 08:36, Mark Struberg wrote:
What happens if you have a @SessionScoped bean in an EAR lib which
is @Specializes in 2 different WebApps within this EAR but not in a
3rd one?
Might get tricky if we drop the original bean, isn't?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 8/24/09, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: [webbeans-dev] which would be easier to implement?
> To: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>, "WebBeans"
<webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
> Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 8:45 PM
> Should we say that any bean that is
> specialized by an enabled bean is
> disabled - i.e. no Bean object exists? Or should we leave
> it like it
> is now?
>
> --
> Gavin King
> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
5613
days inactive
5614
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Gavin King -
Mark Struberg -
Pete Muir