ok. Thanks Martin!
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
To: Emily Jiang <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, Matej Novotny
<manovotn(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, Weld
<weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Date: 17/10/2017 15:14
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
Dne 17.10.2017 v 16:01 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
Back to my original question, TestGroups.SE is not supposed to be run
by
an application server such as Wildfly, Glassfish, Liberty, right?
Yes.
For certifying EE8, these tests are supposed to be excluded by JavaEE
runtimes?
Yes. A Java EE runtime TCK runner should not include the tests from this
group.
Are these tests only for JavaSE runtime such as Hammock?
TestGroups.SE is supposed to be run by a CDI implementation itself.
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
From: Matej Novotny <manovotn(a)redhat.com>
To: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, Emily Jiang
<EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Date: 17/10/2017 14:17
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry for later answer, yea the only TCK test is the one which Martin
pointed to.
However, I don't see much need to cover this particular case on EE part.
The section of the spec which defines throwing ISE with multiple
providers belongs to SE part of the spec, so it feel natural that it's
tested there.
Though if you feel like we should have even EE test then by all means
feel free to create JIRA ticket for this and I'll eventually get to it.
Matej
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Kouba" <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, "Emily
Jiang"
<EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, "Weld" <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 8:53:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
>
> Dne 16.10.2017 v 20:30 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:07 PM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Emily,
> >
> > tests from TestGroups.SE should NOT be run in a Java EE
environment.
> > Note that CDI Bootstrap API should not even work in a Java EE
container
> > (SeContainerInitializer.newInstance() should throw
> > IllegalStateException).
> >
> >
> > Isn't there a TCK test for that?
>
> I think not. There is a test in CDI API which verifies that
> IllegalStateException is thrown if none or multiple service providers
> are found [1]. But it's actually a good idea to create a new TCK test
> with TestGroups.INTEGRATION group to verify ISE is thrown in a Java
EE
> container.
>
> M
>
> [1]
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_cdi-2Dspe...
>
> >
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Dne 16.10.2017 v 14:33 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > Hi Matej/Martin,
> > >
> > > I am looking at the CDI 2.0 tck on JavaSE. I saw they are
under the
> > > groups of "SE". Should the tcks be exercised by JavaEE
runtime, e.g.
> > > wildfly, glassfish, Liberty etc? Which profile did you
package the
> > > JavaSE tck?
> > >
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Emily
> > > ===========================
> > > Emily Jiang
> > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development
Lead
> > >
> > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 <tel:+44%201962%20816278>
Internal:
> > > 246278
> > >
> > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com <mailto:emijiang@uk.ibm.com>
> > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with
> > number
> > > 741598.
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
> > Hampshire PO6 3AU
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
--
Martin Kouba
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU