Pete,
1st, thanks for your help. We usually don't run the coverage reports of the RI because
we do not like to look at your code too much. This shouldn't get a 1:1 copy of the RI
but should proof that the Spec (+TCK) is enough to build a whole new JSR-299
implementation.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> schrieb am So, 15.3.2009:
Von: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Betreff: Re: [webbeans-dev] TCK-Test -->
ProducerFieldDefinitionTest#testNonStaticProducerFieldNotInherited
An: "Gurkan Erdogdu" <gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com>
CC: webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Datum: Sonntag, 15. März 2009, 0:28
Yes, this is why it is essential to
read the coverage report at the same time to understand what
is being tested.
On 14 Mar 2009, at 23:25, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> It is very difficult to understand TCK tests that are
written by others and it gets so much time. So questions are
inevitable.
>
> In the mean time, Pete thanks for helping and
commenting. After that, I will attach jira issues for
all other my questions.
>
> Cheers;
>
> Gurkan
>
> From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com>
> Cc: webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:05:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] TCK-Test -->
ProducerFieldDefinitionTest#testNonStaticProducerFieldNotInherited
>
> No, this is testing that producer fields aren't
inherited by default.
>
> I suggest you read the spec-assertion matched, and
reference in the coverage report
http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/jsr299-tck-impl/1....
>
> This list really isn't the right place to discuss this
- please either open JIRA issues or forum topics.
>
> On 14 Mar 2009, at 22:53, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> > Hi ;
> >
> > In this test, InfertileChicken is selected for
Chicken API type, because DeploymentType precedence is
higher than Chicken. So *egg* field is called over
InfertileChicken.(Field parent instance API Type = Chicken
and Binding Type = @Current)
> >
> > But test is contradicted to this. Or any other
semantic exist?
> >
> > @AnotherDeploymentType
> > class InfertileChicken extends Chicken
> > {
> >
> > }
> >
> > class Chicken
> > {
> >
> > @Produces @Foo
> > private Egg egg = new Egg(this);
> >
> > }
> >
> > Thanks;
> >
> > Gurkan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > webbeans-dev mailing list
> > webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
> --
> Pete Muir
>
http://www.seamframework.org
>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>
>
>
--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev