Hello
In order to keep all the information in one place, I have added my comments
directly into the GH issue.
See
https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues/33940#issuecomment-384...
I have added not only an answer to your question but also several comments
on what was stated in the issue.
Hope that helps.
Let's keep the conversation flowing there
Matej
On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 2:10 AM Benjamin Confino <BENJAMIC(a)uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Hello
I recently received the following customer issue:
https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues/33940
The customer is using a library with a CDI extension:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/krazo/blob/4.0.1/core/src/main/java/org/e...
And that extension calls BeforeBeanAnnotation.addAnnotatedType (via a
Utils class) on many types, one of them (KrazoConfig) has no bean defining
annotations.
I've found that if I have no beans.xml in the krazo jar, this works fine,
and the various injection points expecting a KrazoConfig in this jar are
happy. But if I add a beans.xml file with a scanning mode of none, I get
UnsatisfiedResolutionExceptions for KrazoConfig.
My question is, is this behaviour expected? And if so please can you point
me to the spec that defines this behaviour?
Regards
Benjamin
Unless otherwise stated above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road,
Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list -- weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
To unsubscribe send an email to weld-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
Privacy Statement:
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/privacy-policy
List Archives:
https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/weld-dev@lists.jboss.org/message/TL...