Renaming sounds good to me.
So initially, this repo would have:
- APBs for Mobile Apps
- Ansible playbooks for bringing up local openshift cluster with
service-catalog & ansible broker
- UI code for Mobile bits in the OpenShift Web Console
i'm good with mobile-core as it's a good starting point for developers
On 15 December 2017 at 11:35, John Frizelle <jfrizell(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I wonder about renaming mcp-standalone as part of the move - perhaps
to
"mobile-core" or similar.
--
John Frizelle
Chief Architect, Red Hat Mobile
Consulting Engineer
mobile: *+353 87 290 1644 <//+353872901644>*
twitter:* @johnfriz*
skype: *john_frizelle*
mail: *jfrizell(a)redhat.com <jfrizell(a)redhat.com>*
On 15 December 2017 at 11:32, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> +1 on all of that
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:15 PM, David Martin <davmarti(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thoughts on doing this welcome
>>
>> TLDR
>> * Move the mcp-standalone repo to Aerogear github org
>> * remove the mcp server
>> * remove the mcp-standalone service from the Android, iOS & Cordova APBs
>> * remove the Mobile Tab from the UI
>> * use the remaining ansible stuff for local development
>>
>>
>> Goals of a 5.x local development environment
>> * environment for developing services
>> * a running OpenShift for developing the CLI against
>> * ability to develop the OpenShift UI with a quick feedback loop
>> * has the Service Catalog & OpenShift Ansible Broker (for developing
>> APBs)
>>
>>
>> DETAILS
>> Move the mcp-standalone repo to Aerogear github org
>> * part of the overall shift to the aerogear community, and drawing a
>> line under the 5.x POC work
>>
>> Remove the mcp server
>> * the mcp server is not going to be continued
>> * it was providing some smarts around openshift, which will ultimately
>> live in APBs or the CLI/UI
>>
>> Remove the mcp-standalone service from the Android, iOS & Cordova APBs
>> * See last point as the server is not required
>> * these App APBs will just need to create a mobile app representation in
>> OpenShift e.g. a ConfigMap or Mobile App CRD [1] (Separate
>> proposal/discussion for switching to a CRD)
>>
>> Remove the Mobile Tab from the UI
>> * Working with UX people, the Mobile tab is not the route we're taking
>> * Mobile will become more relevant on the main OpenShift Overview page
>> * UI development can continue similar to before (via UI extensions)
>> until a decision is made about how mobile bits make it into the Openshift
>> Web Console
>>
>> Use the remaining ansible stuff for local development
>> * The ansible playbooks & roles in this repo are very useful for setting
>> up openshift with the ansible service broker
>>
>>
>> [1]
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/api-extension/custom-resources/
>> --
>> David Martin
>> Red Hat Mobile
>> Twitter: @irldavem
>> IRC: @irldavem (feedhenry, mobile-internal)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> feedhenry-dev mailing list
>> feedhenry-dev(a)redhat.com
>>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Project lead
AeroGear.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> feedhenry-dev mailing list
> feedhenry-dev(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>
>
--
David Martin
Red Hat Mobile
Twitter: @irldavem
IRC: @irldavem (feedhenry, mobile-internal)