4:38 a.m.
Howdy,
looks like we need four new repos, on our GH org. I have filed/updated the
following JIRAs for that:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-904
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1189
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1247
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1248
Yes, you all got JIRA notification (I guess), but I am sending this email
since I was commenting on the "repo names" and their potential description
(on github), and wanted feedback...
So, if you feel the names really suck :) Put a name suggestion in there as
well :)
Thanks!
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
5:01 a.m.
And also one for the Simple Push Server:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1218
Thanks,
/Dan
On 28 May 2013 11:38, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Howdy,
looks like we need four new repos, on our GH org. I have filed/updated
the following JIRAs for that:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-904
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1189
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1247
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1248
Yes, you all got JIRA notification (I guess), but I am sending this email
since I was commenting on the "repo names" and their potential description
(on github), and wanted feedback...
So, if you feel the names really suck :) Put a name suggestion in there as
well :)
Thanks!
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
2:18 p.m.
So the repo names so far:
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-simplepush-server
push-registration-ios
unified-push
unified-push-java-client
I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
consistency ;)
Thoughts?
--
qmx
2:30 p.m.
yeah, these names do make sense!
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
So the repo names so far:
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-simplepush-server
push-registration-ios
unified-push
unified-push-java-client
I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
consistency ;)
Thoughts?
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
2:37 p.m.
Ok... :)
not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo
name), but that's not really that important...
for consistency, why not ?
aerogear-simplepush-server
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-push-registration-ios
aerogear-unified-push
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
yeah, these names do make sense!
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> So the repo names so far:
>
> aerogear-push-ios-demo
> aerogear-simplepush-server
> push-registration-ios
> unified-push
> unified-push-java-client
>
> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
> consistency ;)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
2:47 p.m.
aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
Ok... :)
not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo
name), but that's not really that important...
for consistency, why not ?
aerogear-simplepush-server
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-push-registration-ios
aerogear-unified-push
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
> yeah, these names do make sense!
>
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> So the repo names so far:
>>
>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>> push-registration-ios
>> unified-push
>> unified-push-java-client
>>
>> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
>> consistency ;)
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
3:07 p.m.
+1 to add aerogear- on repo name
-1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
Is it for server?
wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
If we have client, we have server, right?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
> Ok... :)
>
> not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the
> repo name), but that's not really that important...
>
> for consistency, why not ?
> aerogear-simplepush-server
> aerogear-push-ios-demo
> aerogear-push-registration-ios
> aerogear-unified-push
> aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
>> yeah, these names do make sense!
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>>> So the repo names so far:
>>>
>>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>>> push-registration-ios
>>> unified-push
>>> unified-push-java-client
>>>
>>> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
>>> consistency ;)
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
3:18 p.m.
j
On Monday, June 10, 2013, Daniel Passos wrote:
+1 to add aerogear- on repo name
-1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
Is it for server?
wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
If we have client, we have server, right?
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
Ok... :)
not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo
name), but that's not really that important...
for consistency, why not ?
aerogear-simplepush-server
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-push-registration-ios
aerogear-unified-push
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
yeah, these names do make sense!
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
So the repo names so far:
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-simplepush-server
push-registration-ios
unified-push
unified-push-java-client
I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
consistency ;)
Thoughts?
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
9:33 a.m.
So, what about this list:
* aerogear-simplepush-server
* aerogear-push-ios-demo
* aerogear-push-ios- registration
* aerogear-unified-push-server
* aerogear-unified-push-java-client
greetings,
matthias
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
j
On Monday, June 10, 2013, Daniel Passos wrote:
> +1 to add aerogear- on repo name
>
> -1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
> I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
>
> Is it for server?
> wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
> If we have client, we have server, right?
>
+1
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
> aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
> Ok... :)
>
> not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the
> repo name), but that's not really that important...
>
> for consistency, why not ?
> aerogear-simplepush-server
> aerogear-push-ios-demo
> aerogear-push-registration-ios
> aerogear-unified-push
> aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
> yeah, these names do make sense!
>
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
> So the repo names so far:
>
> aerogear-push-ios-demo
> aerogear-simplepush-server
> push-registration-ios
> unified-push
> unified-push-java-client
>
> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
> consistency ;)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
9:34 a.m.
+1 Those names work for me.
On 11 June 2013 16:33, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
So, what about this list:
* aerogear-simplepush-server
* aerogear-push-ios-demo
* aerogear-push-ios- registration
* aerogear-unified-push-server
* aerogear-unified-push-java-client
greetings,
matthias
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
> j
>
>
> On Monday, June 10, 2013, Daniel Passos wrote:
>
>> +1 to add aerogear- on repo name
>>
>> -1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>> I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
>>
>> Is it for server?
>> wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
>> If we have client, we have server, right?
>>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>>
>> aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>>
>> Ok... :)
>>
>> not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the
>> repo name), but that's not really that important...
>>
>> for consistency, why not ?
>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>> aerogear-push-registration-ios
>> aerogear-unified-push
>> aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>>
>> yeah, these names do make sense!
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>> So the repo names so far:
>>
>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>> push-registration-ios
>> unified-push
>> unified-push-java-client
>>
>> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
>> consistency ;)
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
9:38 a.m.
+1
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daniel Bevenius
<daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>wrote:
+1 Those names work for me.
On 11 June 2013 16:33, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
> So, what about this list:
> * aerogear-simplepush-server
> * aerogear-push-ios-demo
> * aerogear-push-ios- registration
> * aerogear-unified-push-server
> * aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>
> greetings,
> matthias
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
>> j
>>
>>
>> On Monday, June 10, 2013, Daniel Passos wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to add aerogear- on repo name
>>>
>>> -1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>>> I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
>>>
>>> Is it for server?
>>> wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
>>> If we have client, we have server, right?
>>>
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok... :)
>>>
>>> not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the
>>> repo name), but that's not really that important...
>>>
>>> for consistency, why not ?
>>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>>> aerogear-push-registration-ios
>>> aerogear-unified-push
>>> aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> yeah, these names do make sense!
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> So the repo names so far:
>>>
>>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>>> push-registration-ios
>>> unified-push
>>> unified-push-java-client
>>>
>>> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
>>> consistency ;)
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
9:44 a.m.
+1
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
So, what about this list:
* aerogear-simplepush-server
* aerogear-push-ios-demo
* aerogear-push-ios- registration
* aerogear-unified-push-server
* aerogear-unified-push-java-client
greetings,
matthias
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
> j
>
>
> On Monday, June 10, 2013, Daniel Passos wrote:
>
>> +1 to add aerogear- on repo name
>>
>> -1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>> I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
>>
>> Is it for server?
>> wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
>> If we have client, we have server, right?
>>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>>
>> aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>>
>> Ok... :)
>>
>> not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the
>> repo name), but that's not really that important...
>>
>> for consistency, why not ?
>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>> aerogear-push-registration-ios
>> aerogear-unified-push
>> aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>>
>> yeah, these names do make sense!
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>> So the repo names so far:
>>
>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>> push-registration-ios
>> unified-push
>> unified-push-java-client
>>
>> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
>> consistency ;)
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
10:46 a.m.
not perfect ? :)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:33:58PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> So, what about this list:
> * aerogear-simplepush-server
> * aerogear-push-ios-demo
> * aerogear-push-ios- registration
> * aerogear-unified-push-server
> * aerogear-unified-push-java-client
Way better!
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
10:49 a.m.
+1
On 11 June 2013 17:46, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
not perfect ? :)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:33:58PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > So, what about this list:
> > * aerogear-simplepush-server
> > * aerogear-push-ios-demo
> > * aerogear-push-ios- registration
> > * aerogear-unified-push-server
> > * aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>
> Way better!
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:23 a.m.
+1
On Jun 11, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
So, what about this list:
* aerogear-simplepush-server
* aerogear-push-ios-demo
* aerogear-push-ios- registration
* aerogear-unified-push-server
* aerogear-unified-push-java-client
greetings,
matthias
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
j
On Monday, June 10, 2013, Daniel Passos wrote:
+1 to add aerogear- on repo name
-1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
Is it for server?
wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
If we have client, we have server, right?
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Ok... :)
not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo name), but
that's not really that important...
for consistency, why not ?
aerogear-simplepush-server
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-push-registration-ios
aerogear-unified-push
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
yeah, these names do make sense!
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
So the repo names so far:
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-simplepush-server
push-registration-ios
unified-push
unified-push-java-client
I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
consistency ;)
Thoughts?
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
3971
days inactive
3986
days old
16 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Christos Vasilakis -
Corinne Krych -
Daniel Bevenius -
Daniel Passos -
Douglas Campos -
Matthias Wessendorf -
Sebastien Blanc