Hi, the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3. Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..

Any thoughts? -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

+1 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3. >> >> Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch. >> > > +1 > > >> >> That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can >> branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this >> branch.. >> > > makes sense > > >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

+1 On Apr 15, 2015 3:38 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3. > > Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch. > > That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can > branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this > branch.. > > Any thoughts? > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev