Re: [bv-dev] Question on Formal Group Definitions rules

Hi Matt, On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:46 AM, Matt Benson <mbenson(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: omitted? If the sequence defined by a superclass to be respected, where is this specified? TBH I would think it would make sense, but my read of this section specifically set me down a path of removing this behavior from the Apache BVal codebase as I couldn't find a justification for it. Isn't it because it's a group sequence? So as long as a constraint of the Minimal group fails, the ones from the group A are not checked. As you can see in the following assertions, when size is valid, name is checked. AFAICS, it's the behavior I would expect but maybe I'm missing something? -- Guillaume