Re: [bv-dev] Validator#forMethods()

+1 for naming consistency Best regards, Seb On 04.01.2013 11:05, Gunnar Morling wrote: Hi all, While working on the TCK, I came across our new method Validator#forMethods() which allows to validate method and constructor parameters/return values. Given that we introduced the term "executable" when referring to both methods and constructors, I wondered whether the method should better be named "forExecutables()". Thoughts? --Gunnar _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing listbeanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev