Re: [bv-dev] Support for constraints on container values (e.g. Collection<@Email String>)

+1 If everyone could take a look at this one, that'd be great! It's a bit more complex, so the more eyes we get on this one, the better. Thanks! 2016-09-19 13:28 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt;: > This is probably going to be most visible feature of Bean Validation > 2.0. We particularly need your feedback and involvement on this one. > > Emmanuel > > On Tue 2016-09-06 18:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >I and a few others have been working on a proposal to support things > >like Collection<@Email String> and Optional<@Email String>. This is > >more complicated that it seems at first glance. > > > >Instead of doing an ad-hoc support for the various collection types, > >Optional and the JavaFX Properties, we quickly decided to define the > >notion of container and the ability to declare constraints on contained > >elements to validate them. > > > >This lead to two main proposals that you can read at > >http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-508/ > > > >This is a relatively long read, you can start by ignoring "alternative" > >options for your first pass. We are very interested in feedback at this > >stage as we have been pushing these proposal very far already and they > >would need to become part of the spec as next step. > > > >Let me know of what you think, questions, remarks etc. > > > >In particular, I'm interested in what you think of the following. > > > >The capability to define custom containers. > > > >The extractor approach vs its alternative. > > > >The concepts of @ConstraintsAppliesTo(COMTAINED) used for JavaFX and for > >subclasses of containers. > > > >@Valid, in particular the legacy and new forms and how to handle the > >transition. > > > >And finally, but a big one, what do you think of proposal 1 vs proposal > >2. The latter being more generic but with more open questions (and a > >less elaborated at this stage). > > > >Emmanuel > >_______________________________________________ > >beanvalidation-dev mailing list > &gt;beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev