Yes, it is awesome, absolutely love it. Kudos to your friend and you for
making this happen!
Am 03.01.2017 6:28 nachm. schrieb "Hendrik Ebbers"
<hendrik.ebbers(a)me.com>:
THX, but I haven't done the sketch ;) A designer made it. If you
all like
it I will order a vector based logo.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 03.01.2017 um 18:00 schrieb Christian Kaltepoth <christian(a)kaltepoth.de
>:
Hendrik,
I love your sketch of the logo. It looks great! Thanks for working on it!
Christian
2017-01-02 23:13 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Ebbers <hendrik.ebbers(a)me.com>:
> Hi all & a happy new year!
>
> I received a first sketch for the JSR logo (final version will be vector
> based). What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hendrik
>
> <jbv_scribble_1.jpg>
>
>
> Am 31.12.2016 um 17:35 schrieb Christian Kaltepoth <
> christian(a)kaltepoth.de>:
>
> Hey Gunnar,
>
> thank you very much for these kind words. I would also like to thank you
> and everyone else in the EG for the great work. Keep up the good work
> everyone! :-)
>
> Christian
>
> 2016-12-23 11:28 GMT+01:00 Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the year's end is approaching, I'd like to wish everyone Happy
>> Holidays and a great year 2017! I hope you can relax a bit during the
>> holidays and have a great time with your loved ones.
>>
>> Also let me say a big "thank you" for all your contributions to Bean
>> Validation 2.0; all the proposals, discussions, reviews etc. have been
>> very valuable and are appreciated very much. I think we've made some
>> good progress already, with some easy wins already merged and more
>> complex matters such as type-level constraints having advanced quite a
>> bit.
>>
>> While waiting for some more feedback on the latest revision of the
>> extractor proposal [1], I'm finally getting back to the proposal for
>> java.time support. The API change has already been merged, the RI will
>> follow closely and you can expect a pull request for the spec update
>> very soon.
>>
>> With these two things (value extractors, java.time support) in place
>> at least in some preliminary form, I think we are in good shape for a
>> first preview release of the spec. Is there anything missing that you
>> think should absolutely be in the first preview? My goal is to do the
>> release early in January. I hope we can get some feedback from the
>> wider community based on this.
>>
>> Subsequently, we should pick up some other loose ends such as the
>> validateValues() idea (BVAL-214) and other things like constraint
>> ordering (BVAL-248), separation of message interpolation and message
>> bundle retrieval (BVAL-217) and more.
>>
>> All, thanks again for your efforts with this spec. I'm looking forward
>> to making BV 2.0 happen together with you in 2017!
>>
>> --Gunnar
>>
>> [1]
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/2016-Dec
>> ember/001140.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog:
http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
> Twitter:
http://twitter.com/chkal
> GitHub:
https://github.com/chkal
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog:
http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/chkal
GitHub:
https://github.com/chkal
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev