1:06 p.m.
How should we handle the proposals?
- discuss by mail?
- PR to:
https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/blob/staging/proposa...
- comment on page: http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-214/
Currently I have no idea what is the right way :)
Cheers,
Hendrik
Am 01.09.2016 um 13:02 schrieb Hendrik Ebbers
<hendrik.ebbers(a)me.com>:
Hi,
I had a deeper look at BVAL-214 (http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-214/
<http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-214/>) and have some additional input.
Since we depend on java 8 I think it would make sense to use suppliers to create the bean
mocks for validation. This can look like this:
BeanValidator<ContactDataModel> contactValidator =
BeanValidator.build(ContactDataModel.class);
contactValidator.withProperty("city", () -> cityField.getText()).
withProperty("zipCode", () -> zipCodeField.getText());
In addition I think that it will be important to have a better feedback for the
violations that are based on a UI field. If you have a violation based in the text of the
cityField you normally want to mark that field in the UI. I think a consumer can really
help here:
contactValidator.withProperty("city", () -> cityField.getText(), v ->
markCityField(v));
By doing so you will always get the set of violations that is based on the value in the
city field.
You can find a first idea of such an interface and 2 view controller examples here:
https://github.com/guigarage/validation-playground/tree/master/src/main/j...
<https://github.com/guigarage/validation-playground/tree/master/src/main/j...
Cheers,
Hendrik
> Am 01.09.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org
<mailto:gunnar@hibernate.org>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately I won't be able to attend JavaOne myself, but still it should be a
great opportunity for members of the BV EG and community to meet and exchange.
>
> As per [1] there is a BV 2.0 Hackergarten event scheduled for Tuesday the 20th, led
by Michael Nascimento. Thanks for taking this initiative, Michael!
>
> Interesting things to discuss and explore might be proposals written by then (e.g.
the one around List<@Email>, Emmanuel is working on updating this one) and things
like ordering of constraints (BVAL-248, [2]) or David Blevins' proposal around using
Lambdas (BVAL-515, [3]). David should be there, so make sure to get hold of him :)
>
> Another interesting topic is integration with other specs/techs (e.g. javax.money or
JavaFX). Specifically, there are several pending issues around the integration of BV and
JAX-RS:
>
> * Provides means to disable BV during JAX-RS lifecycle validation (BVAL-520, [4])
> * Provide facility for more flexible HTTP error codes when using BV with JAX-RS
(BVAL-518, [5])
> * Pass the request locale to BV's MessageInterpolator
>
> Mostly these things would have to be done on the JAX-RS side, so it would be great to
have a chat with them if there is the chance for it.
>
> Apart from that, essentially anything would be great which helps with forming a
picture of the community's needs and requirements.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Gunnar
>
> [1] http://linkis.com/community.oracle.com/bhe4K
<http://linkis.com/community.oracle.com/bhe4K>
> [2] https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-248
<https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-248>
> [3] https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-515
<https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-515>
> [4] https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-520
<https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-520>
> [5] https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-518
<https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-518>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev