THX, but I haven't done the sketch ;) A designer made it. If you all like it I will
order a vector based logo.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 03.01.2017 um 18:00 schrieb Christian Kaltepoth
<christian(a)kaltepoth.de>:
Hendrik,
I love your sketch of the logo. It looks great! Thanks for working on it!
Christian
2017-01-02 23:13 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Ebbers <hendrik.ebbers(a)me.com>:
> Hi all & a happy new year!
>
> I received a first sketch for the JSR logo (final version will be vector based). What
do you think?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hendrik
>
> <jbv_scribble_1.jpg>
>
>
>> Am 31.12.2016 um 17:35 schrieb Christian Kaltepoth
<christian(a)kaltepoth.de>:
>>
>> Hey Gunnar,
>>
>> thank you very much for these kind words. I would also like to thank you and
everyone else in the EG for the great work. Keep up the good work everyone! :-)
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> 2016-12-23 11:28 GMT+01:00 Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As the year's end is approaching, I'd like to wish everyone Happy
>>> Holidays and a great year 2017! I hope you can relax a bit during the
>>> holidays and have a great time with your loved ones.
>>>
>>> Also let me say a big "thank you" for all your contributions to
Bean
>>> Validation 2.0; all the proposals, discussions, reviews etc. have been
>>> very valuable and are appreciated very much. I think we've made some
>>> good progress already, with some easy wins already merged and more
>>> complex matters such as type-level constraints having advanced quite a
>>> bit.
>>>
>>> While waiting for some more feedback on the latest revision of the
>>> extractor proposal [1], I'm finally getting back to the proposal for
>>> java.time support. The API change has already been merged, the RI will
>>> follow closely and you can expect a pull request for the spec update
>>> very soon.
>>>
>>> With these two things (value extractors, java.time support) in place
>>> at least in some preliminary form, I think we are in good shape for a
>>> first preview release of the spec. Is there anything missing that you
>>> think should absolutely be in the first preview? My goal is to do the
>>> release early in January. I hope we can get some feedback from the
>>> wider community based on this.
>>>
>>> Subsequently, we should pick up some other loose ends such as the
>>> validateValues() idea (BVAL-214) and other things like constraint
>>> ordering (BVAL-248), separation of message interpolation and message
>>> bundle retrieval (BVAL-217) and more.
>>>
>>> All, thanks again for your efforts with this spec. I'm looking forward
>>> to making BV 2.0 happen together with you in 2017!
>>>
>>> --Gunnar
>>>
>>> [1]
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/2016-December/001140....
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Kaltepoth
>> Blog:
http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
>> Twitter:
http://twitter.com/chkal
>> GitHub:
https://github.com/chkal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog:
http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/chkal
GitHub:
https://github.com/chkal
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev