>> @DecimalMax(value = "0.0", exclusive = true)
>
> Can we name it "inclusive" rather than "exclusive"? Personally I
prefer
> positive variable/method names as I think they read better, in particular
> when it comes to negation.
I think inclusive also has a clearer meaning, it took me three reads
through to work out what the purpose was. I wondered if Hardy picked
exclusive for a sensible default value, but gave up trying to get my
head around it (newborn baby is my excuse).
Well, I just used 'exclude', because it was used in the jira ticket. Now that I
think about it 'inclusive' is much better.
Maybe I can play the newborn card as well? Does it still count after 4 months? I
definitely still feel tired.
Welcome to the club.
--Hardy