Hi Antonio,
It's an ongoing debate whether it's good to put repo information into POMs
or not, see e.g. [1]. The major problem is that users of such a pom.xml as
dependency will get that repo pulled into their own build, which might not
be what they want.
Now I guess there won't be many people using the TCK as dependency, but I
still think it's saver to leave the repo info out of the POM and have users
add it to their settings.xml. With the BV reference implementation we
provide an examplary settings.xml which can be used for building: mvn clean
install -s settings-example.xml. I've created a ticket for the TCK to do
the same [2].
Thanks again for your feedback,
--Gunnar
[1]
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-p...
[2]
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVTCK-30
2012/12/23 Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing(a)gmail.com>
Thanks, just by adding the following repository in the pom.xml works.
You
might want to add it to the pom as not everybody declares JBoss Repo in
their settings.xml
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>jboss-public-repository</id>
<name>JBoss Public Repository</name>
<
url>https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss/
</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
Thanks again
2012/12/23 Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org>
>
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/MavenGettingStarted-Users
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site <
http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/agoncal>
| LinkedIn <
http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris
JUG<http://www.parisjug.org/>
| Devoxx France <
http://www.devoxx.fr/>
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev