We could. But I remember not liking the JDK version for a reason. That might have
On 29 mai 2012, at 21:15, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
thanks, that's good to know.
I think we still could aim for BV being Java 6 compatible, allowing to
use it in plain SE 6 environments.
The reason I was asking was that I recently stumbled upon
j.v.Validation$DefaultValidationProviderResolver in the spec JAR. When
we assume Java 6 as a minimum requirement, I think we could simplify
the resolver class by leveraging java.util.ServiceLoader which was
introduced with Java 6.
2012/5/29 Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel(a)oracle.com>:
> Hi all,
> Java EE 7 requires Java SE 7. More generally, Java EE N requires Java SE N.
> On 5/29/2012 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> I don't remember if EE 7 requires java 6 or 7.
>> Unless there is a compelling reason, I'd rather BV be compatible with Java
>> On 29 mai 2012, at 18:20, Gunnar Morling<gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>> is there a certain Java version which can be assumed for BV 1.1?
>>> I think Hardy once told me that JEE 7 and thus BV 1.1 will be based on
>>> Java 6, but I'm not totally sure anymore.
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev mailing list