Sounds good to me.
Do we already have this somewhere:
JSR Implementations (1.4): Maintenance Leads must provide a complete
list of all implementations of the specification which have been
compatible and have been publicly or commercially released. This list
be provided at least quarterly, to be published publicly on jcp.org
2012/11/22 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek(a)gmail.com>
+1 for being as open as we can!
2012/11/22 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
> I was pretty sure I sent such an email a while back but I can't find it.
> I would like to move our spec to the latest and more opened JCP rules aka
> 2.9. I am almost certain that we do comply with it and that we even go
> further than what is expected of us. For your info rules 2.8 force things
> like publicly visible and archived communication. We currently are under
> the JCP 2.7 rules.
> Here is a list of changes http://jcp.org/en/resources/2.8
> Here is how to migrate http://jcp.org/en/resources/change_jcp_version
> Please speak up if you don't want the spec to move to the new rules.
> Otherwise I will proceed next week after turkeys have been thoroughly
> digested by our USA reps :)
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev mailing list