With part of BVAL-327 now in the spec, I'm tempted to create a new subpackage named 'executable'. It would contain the two new classes: - @ValidateExecutable - ExecutableType I am also tempted to add ExecutableValidator to it but that's less obvious. Thoughts? Emmanuel _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

+1 from me as well. javax.validation already has almost too many classes. Further separation makes sense. --Hardy On 30 Jan 2013, at 10:30 PM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > Yes, a new package for these two seems not a bad idea. Not sure about ExecutableValidator either. > > --Gunnar > > > 2013/1/24 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; > With part of BVAL-327 now in the spec, I'm tempted to create a new > subpackage named 'executable'. It would contain the two new classes: > > - @ValidateExecutable > - ExecutableType > > I am also tempted to add ExecutableValidator to it but that's less > obvious. > > Thoughts? > > Emmanuel > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

+1 Too bad that GroupSequence isn't there as well. 2013/1/31 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; > In the same vein, I will move ConvertGroup to j.v.groups. > Yell if you disagree. > > Emmanuel > > On Thu 2013-01-31 10:50, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > > +1 from me as well. javax.validation already has almost too many > classes. Further separation makes sense. > > > > --Hardy > > > > On 30 Jan 2013, at 10:30 PM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt; > wrote: > > > > > Yes, a new package for these two seems not a bad idea. Not sure about > ExecutableValidator either. > > > > > > --Gunnar > > > > > > > > > 2013/1/24 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; > > > With part of BVAL-327 now in the spec, I'm tempted to create a new > > > subpackage named 'executable'. It would contain the two new classes: > > > > > > - @ValidateExecutable > > > - ExecutableType > > > > > > I am also tempted to add ExecutableValidator to it but that's less > > > obvious. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Emmanuel > > > _______________________________________________ > > > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > > > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > > > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >

_______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev