Am 19.10.2016 um 14:25 schrieb Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt;: Hi Hendrik, Thanks, having such test bed will be very useful! Adding some association to the model (a plain reference or a collection annotated with @Valid) would be a great addition so we can use it to explore cascaded validation, too. One question: this does not address the actual issue of BVAL-214 - which is the validation of class-level constraints in the course of validateValues() - yet, right? I.e. in its current form, this is essentially taking the existing validateValue() and exposes it in a form more easily digestable for the purposes of UI validation, right? --Gunnar 2016-10-12 8:45 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Ebbers <hendrik.ebbers(a)me.com <mailto:hendrik.ebbers@me.com>>: Hi all, I created a small JavaFX as a playground for proposal BVAL-214. I already added a dummy implementation for my idea (see http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-214/#proposition-2 <http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-214/#proposition-2>). You can find the sources here: https://github.com/guigarage/BeanValidationForUI <https://github.com/guigarage/BeanValidationForUI> I added a dummy implementation for the validation API and the sample can simply be started by the com.guigarage.validation.Demo class I will add some doc later to describe my ideas. Cheers, Hendrik _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev> _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev