On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Radim Vansa <rvansa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
First of all, I think that naming "old", "new"
where 3.2.7 new == 3.4.0
old sucks. Let's use some more meaningful names.
On top of that there's an 3.2.7 old as well.
Bela, jgroups protocols are complicated as as they are :-)
Changing the DONT_BUNDLE flag to apply on network communication but
rather to stack processing isn't a bad idea, if it helps performance.
However, changing the flag meaning to be dependent on the bundler type
sounds rather confusing.
Radim
On 11/08/2013 11:47 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
> I think I'll ignore the DONT_BUNDLE flag on the sender's side if we have
> the right bundler in place. Take a look at [1] and let me know what you
> think...
>
> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1737
>
--
Radim Vansa <rvansa(a)redhat.com>
JBoss DataGrid QA
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)