On 6/6/12 2:27 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
On 6/6/12 3:19 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> Up to you, but you get to be the one to tell the translation team
I'll just forward those emails onto you.
> why
> they have to key all their messages off of an integer ID instead of a
> descriptive name. And you also get to reinvent the tooling which
> provides them with the English translation to work from.
You mean all this crap isn't built on top of simple property files? (At
least thats what I saw in the jboss-logging-processor testsuite)
> Doesn't sound
> like a good use of time to me.
>
I agree. Which is why this is at the very bottom of my queue now
because you guys had to over-engineer this.
Right its not like you had any opportunity during the TAG discussions to
disagree with any particular discussion. Or that you got to see people
saying they disliked the first API which looked similar to what you just
pasted here because of duplication of messages, like of type safety,
lack of message in the java source, performance problems etc. Oh wait
you did!
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss AS Lead / EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat