wrote:

Hi Guys, Now that we have started on AS8 I would like to clean up JBoss Metadata, and get rid of some of the legacy stuff that has accumulated over the years. Basically I would like to branch 7.x for AS7 bug fixes, and start on version 8.0 in master. The changes I want to make are basically: - Run a code formatter over the whole code base, and setup checkstyle rules - Delete all the dead code, that is no longer relevant - Flatten some of the inheritance hierarchies that are a relic from the JAXB parsing days - Fix or delete the ignored tests Nothing major, but I just think that it will make the code more maintainable going forward. I have made a start here: https://github.com/stuartwdouglas/metadata/compare/master Can anyone see any problems with this approach? If not, I will go ahead with this. Stuart _______________________________________________ jboss-as7-dev mailing list jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev

https://github.com/stuartwdouglas/metadata/commit/a6b64b317e5f83f9e19dd20... 'Final' might be a bit premature. :-) I would say make it '8.0.0-SNAPSHOT' instead. Worry about 'Alpha', 'Beta' etc later. In fact I think 'GA' is the latest convention. Carlo On 02/21/2013 10:07 AM, Stuart Douglas wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Now that we have started on AS8 I would like to clean up JBoss Metadata, > and get rid of some of the legacy stuff that has accumulated over the > years. > > Basically I would like to branch 7.x for AS7 bug fixes, and start on > version 8.0 in master. > > The changes I want to make are basically: > > - Run a code formatter over the whole code base, and setup checkstyle > rules > - Delete all the dead code, that is no longer relevant > - Flatten some of the inheritance hierarchies that are a relic from the > JAXB parsing days > - Fix or delete the ignored tests > > Nothing major, but I just think that it will make the code more > maintainable going forward. > > I have made a start here: > > https://github.com/stuartwdouglas/metadata/compare/master > > Can anyone see any problems with this approach? > > If not, I will go ahead with this. > > Stuart > _______________________________________________ > jboss-as7-dev mailing list > jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev

From: "Brian Stansberry" <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com&gt; To: jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:10:51 PM Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] Cleaning up JBoss Metadata On 2/21/13 3:44 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote: > https://github.com/stuartwdouglas/metadata/commit/a6b64b317e5f83f9e19dd20... > > 'Final' might be a bit premature. :-) > I would say make it '8.0.0-SNAPSHOT' instead. Worry about 'Alpha', > 'Beta' etc later. > In fact I think 'GA' is the latest convention. > <foolishly-relying-on-a-wiki>AFAIK, https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning is still authoritative for JBoss community projects, with "Final" the correct term.</foolishly-relying-on-a-wiki>

Red Hat products are another matter. -- Brian Stansberry Principal Software Engineer JBoss by Red Hat _______________________________________________ jboss-as7-dev mailing list jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev