[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Moved: (JBAS-7879) JNDI Lookup for EJB3 Component with EJB2 Interface delivers wrong Proxy (EJB3 instead of EJB2)

JNDI Lookup for EJB3 Component with EJB2 Interface delivers wrong Proxy (EJB3 instead of EJB2) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBAS-7879 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-7879 Project: JBoss Application Server Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.1.0.GA Environment: JBoss 5.1.0 (out of the box). Windows 7 (64 Bit), Also under Windows XP (32 Bit) Java 1.6.0_16 (Sun) Reporter: Volker Raum Two EJB components are packaged into two jars within an EAR. EJB3 is an EJB3.0 Stateless Session Bean. EJB2 is a EJB2.0 Stateless Session Bean. EJB2 needs access to EJB3 so EJB3 was equipped with EJB2.0 Home and Remote Interfaces. 1. The EJB3 is coded like that: ... @Stateless(name="EJB3") @RemoteHome(EJB3Home.class) public class EJB3Bean implements EJB3 { ... 2. EJB3Home looks like this: (for compatibility with EJB2.0) public interface EJB3Home extends EJBHome { public EJB3Remote create() throws CreateException, RemoteException; } 3. EJB3 is the EJB3 Business Remote Interface (according to EJB3.0 Spec) and looks like this: @Remote public interface EJB3 { public void doThings() ; 4. EJB3Remote is a Remote Interface according to the EJB2.0 Spec: public interface EJB3Remote extends EJBObject { public void doThings() throws RemoteException ; ... 5. For the EJB2 there is a deployment descriptor defined. The section for the EJB2 Session Bean contains the following ejb-ref: ... <ejb-ref> <ejb-ref-name>EJB2Remote</ejb-ref-name> <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type> EJB3Home EJB3Remote <ejb-link>EJB3</ejb-link> <!-- results are identical with or without this line--> </ejb-ref> ... 6. The EJB2 does a Lookup like Object obj = jndi.lookup("EJB2Remote") ; What i would expect is an object implementing EJB3Home. After narrowing it i could call create() with it and get a EJB3Remote Object. But what i get instead is an object of type EJB3, the Business Interface. Looks like a bug. jaikiran from the community forums asked me to report this as bug.