]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1061:
--------------------------------
Added test cases in GMS_MergeTest
FLUSH: asymmetric merge fails
-----------------------------
Key: JGRP-1061
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-1061
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 2.8
A: {B,A,C}
B: {B,C}
C: {B,C}
B and C have the same view, but A has a different (older) view which still includes B and
C
The new merge now determines that the partition coordinators for the merge are B and A.
When FLUSH is enabled, before handling the merge request A tries to flush {A,B,C} and B
tries to flush {B,C}. The latter works, but the former fails as A cannot communicate with
B and C !
SOLUTION: the partition for A needs to be {A} and not {B,A,C}.
Is this possible in all cases, or can we NOT prevent merging of overlapping partitions ?
(Then flush would always fail !)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: