[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
David Lloyd commented on AS7-348:
---------------------------------
We're using ${jboss.node.name} as the default node name for a server. In each
component using this name, they can provide an overridden name instead.
${jboss.node.name} is derived from ${jboss.host.name} by default (unless overridden), and
${jboss.host.name} is derived from ${jboss.qualified.host.name}. The
${jboss.qualified.host.name} is derived from the system hostname (or computer name, for
Windows) environment variable (if any), or failing that, the local host's network IP
address.
By default use a common identifier anywhere a server "id"
notion is exposed in the configuration
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-348
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-348
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Domain Management
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: David Lloyd
Fix For: 7.1.0.CR1
This JIRA is based on feedback we received after the Andiamo BOF at JBoss World 2010:
>> * JBoss Transactions, jvm-route, jboss messaging all require a
>> unique identifier for them to behave properly in a clustered
>> environment. I would like one unique identifier for each server
>> configuration and for all services that need a unique identifier
>> to reference it by default. Then I don't have to worry about
>> unique identifiers when creating new servers.
(The jboss messaging bit is out of date with respect to AS 7, which will use HornetQ and
thus has no ServerPeerId configuration required. But the basic point is spot-on.)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira