Container artifacts should have symmetric lifecycles ---------------------------------------------------- Key: JBAS-5332 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5332 Project: JBoss Application Server Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: EJB2 Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta4, JBossAS-4.2.2.GA Reporter: Adrian Brock Fix For: JBossAS-5.0.0.CR1, JBossAS-4.2.3.GA The container artifacts i.e. [Session|Entity|MessageDriven]Container, interceptors, cache, pool, ProxyBindings should have symmetric create/start/stop/destroy methods. e.g. The MessageDrivenContainer does this in destroy // Destroy container invoker for (Iterator it = proxyFactories.keySet().iterator(); it.hasNext();) { String invokerBinding = (String) it.next(); EJBProxyFactory ci = (EJBProxyFactory) proxyFactories.get(invokerBinding); ci.destroy(); ci.setContainer(null); try { ObjectName containerName = super.getJmxName(); Hashtable props = containerName.getKeyPropertyList(); props.put("plugin", "invoker"); props.put("binding", invokerBinding); ObjectName invokerName = new ObjectName(containerName.getDomain(), props); server.unregisterMBean(invokerName); } catch(Throwable ignore) { } } The setContainer(null) is wrong since it isn't the one that sets the container in create() that is done by EjbModule in its createService() method In this case, the fix is to either move the setting of container to MessageDrivenContainer::createService() or move the nulling of the container to EjbModule::destroyService() Other artifacts also need checking and fixing with tests writing to validate that each container can go through a stop/destroy/create/start lifecycle and still function correctly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira