[JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBAS-1435) JCA Interceptors
by Anil Saldhana (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1435?page=all ]
Anil Saldhana updated JBAS-1435:
--------------------------------
Summary: JCA Interceptors (was: Interceptors)
> JCA Interceptors
> ----------------
>
> Key: JBAS-1435
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1435
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JCA service
> Reporter: Adrian Brock
> Assigned To: Shelly McGowan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: JBossAS-5.0.1.CR1
>
>
> Forums discussion thread: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=48683
> This is really a major rewrite of the JCA implementation to be less monolithic
> so this will need some careful design and consideration and
> breaking up into more fine grained tasks.
> The idea is to provide containers/interceptors for the components within the JCA module
> such that these components can be more easily customised and developed according to
> the needs of each user.
> There are three main interceptor stacks that I can think of:
> 1) ConnectionManager (connection allocation)
> This provides an interceptor stack behind the ConnectionFactory/DataSource proxy
> to process the allocateConnection invocation.
> It will look something like:
> ConnectionFactory proxy -> ConnectionManager interceptor -> Pooling interceptor
> 2) ManagedConnection/ConnectionEventListener (connection management)
> This stack provides most of the features that are currently performed by the
> BaseManagerConnection2$ConnectionListener and their supporting methods,
> but as an interceptor stack.
> As now they will largely be driven by the events from the resource adapter,
> and it this object that is actually pooled.
> 3) Resource Adaptors
> The JDBC and JMS adaptors should be implemented as interceptor stacks
> to allow optional interceptors like statistics collection, custom behaviour
> and also to perform vendor specific processing/workarounds.
> Where AOP can be used, we could actually instrument the vendor classes so
> we can also expose vendor specific methods, not just the JDBC interfaces.
> This would remove the requirement to do things like getUnderlyingConection() by user code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4973) SuSE daemon script doesn't release standard input
by Brian Kalbfus (JIRA)
SuSE daemon script doesn't release standard input
-------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-4973
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4973
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Patch
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: System service
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.2.2.GA, JBossAS-4.2.1.GA, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta3
Environment: SuSE Linux
Reporter: Brian Kalbfus
Assigned To: Dimitris Andreadis
Priority: Minor
After modifying locations in the script, I ran the jboss_init_suse.sh script. It runs fine but the shell I launched it from hangs when I exit. I resolved this by adding stdin redirection to /dev/null. The same may be true for other daemon scripts.
Original script snippet:
case "$1" in
start)
echo -n "Starting JBoss application server: "
cd $JBOSS_HOME/bin
if [ -z "$SUBIT" ]; then
eval $CMD_START >${JBOSS_CONSOLE} 2>&1 &
else
$SUBIT "$CMD_START >${JBOSS_CONSOLE} 2>&1 &"
fi
# Remember status and be verbose
rc_status -v
;;
changed it to:
case "$1" in
start)
echo -n "Starting JBoss application server: "
cd $JBOSS_HOME/bin
if [ -z "$SUBIT" ]; then
eval $CMD_START >${JBOSS_CONSOLE} 2>&1 </dev/null &
else
$SUBIT "$CMD_START >${JBOSS_CONSOLE} 2>&1 </dev/null &"
fi
# Remember status and be verbose
rc_status -v
;;
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] Assigned: (JBAS-1435) Interceptors
by Dimitris Andreadis (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1435?page=all ]
Dimitris Andreadis reassigned JBAS-1435:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Shelly McGowan (was: Weston Price)
Assign to Shelly
> Interceptors
> ------------
>
> Key: JBAS-1435
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1435
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JCA service
> Reporter: Adrian Brock
> Assigned To: Shelly McGowan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: JBossAS-5.0.1.CR1
>
>
> Forums discussion thread: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=48683
> This is really a major rewrite of the JCA implementation to be less monolithic
> so this will need some careful design and consideration and
> breaking up into more fine grained tasks.
> The idea is to provide containers/interceptors for the components within the JCA module
> such that these components can be more easily customised and developed according to
> the needs of each user.
> There are three main interceptor stacks that I can think of:
> 1) ConnectionManager (connection allocation)
> This provides an interceptor stack behind the ConnectionFactory/DataSource proxy
> to process the allocateConnection invocation.
> It will look something like:
> ConnectionFactory proxy -> ConnectionManager interceptor -> Pooling interceptor
> 2) ManagedConnection/ConnectionEventListener (connection management)
> This stack provides most of the features that are currently performed by the
> BaseManagerConnection2$ConnectionListener and their supporting methods,
> but as an interceptor stack.
> As now they will largely be driven by the events from the resource adapter,
> and it this object that is actually pooled.
> 3) Resource Adaptors
> The JDBC and JMS adaptors should be implemented as interceptor stacks
> to allow optional interceptors like statistics collection, custom behaviour
> and also to perform vendor specific processing/workarounds.
> Where AOP can be used, we could actually instrument the vendor classes so
> we can also expose vendor specific methods, not just the JDBC interfaces.
> This would remove the requirement to do things like getUnderlyingConection() by user code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 1 month