[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBMICROCONT-149) VFS is missing privileged blocks
by Scott M Stark (JIRA)
VFS is missing privileged blocks
--------------------------------
Key: JBMICROCONT-149
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-149
Project: JBoss MicroContainer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: VFS
Reporter: Scott M Stark
Assigned To: Scott M Stark
Fix For: JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta3
Run ant tests-security-manager in jbossas:
http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-head-testsuite-sun-1.5/...
16:35:49,790 DEBUG [MainDeployerImpl] Add deployment context:
vfsfile:/services/cruisecontrol/checkout/jboss-head-testsuite-sun-1.5/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.Beta2/server/default/conf/jboss-service.xml
16:35:49,799 WARN [DeclaredStructure] Error determining structure:jboss-service.xml
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.FilePermission/services/cruisecontrol/checkout/jboss-head-testsuite-sun-1.5/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.Beta2/server/default/conf/jboss-service.xml read)
at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:264)
at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:427)
at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532)
at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkRead(SecurityManager.java:871)
at java.io.File.isFile(File.java:745)
at org.jboss.virtual.plugins.context.file.FileHandler.isLeaf(FileHandler.java:133)
at org.jboss.virtual.VirtualFile.isLeaf(VirtualFile.java:182)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBMICROCONT-157) Leak due to VirtualFileURLConnection.class.urlCache()
by Scott M Stark (JIRA)
Leak due to VirtualFileURLConnection.class.urlCache()
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBMICROCONT-157
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-157
Project: JBoss MicroContainer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: VFS
Affects Versions: JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta3
Reporter: Scott M Stark
Assigned To: Scott M Stark
Fix For: JBossMC_2_0_0_CR1
> I think I got another one.
> There is a static ref to the VFS in VirtualFileURLConnection. In the end
> the VirtualFile is kept in memory. See left bottom on the picture. If
> these are the things to look for, then I got a bundle more.
> Note that the VirtualFile is actually a reference to an EJB3 deployment,
> so it's probably EJB3 code not cleaning up properly. But this shouldn't
> lock down a ref in VFS.
There is definately a memory leak in
VirtualFileURLConnection.class.urlCache(). It grows without bounds.
After an incomplete JBossWS test run 53 megs of heap is tied to this
cache.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4071) Provide information about non-XA resource participating in multibranch transactions
by Mauricio Seeberger (JIRA)
Provide information about non-XA resource participating in multibranch transactions
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-4071
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4071
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Patch
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Other, Transaction Manager
Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta1, JBossAS-4.0.5.GA
Environment: Linux 2.6.9 RHEL4 on AMD64 and jdk 1.5.0_09-amd64.
Reporter: Mauricio Seeberger
When you have more than one non-XA resource participating in a multibranch transaction, then you have a problem in your code and sooner or later it will result in inconsistent data. But JBoss (TxConnectionManager) just logs just once a generic message:
Prepare called on a local tx. Use of local transactions on a jta transaction with more than one branch may result in inconsistent data in some cases of failure.
We need more information about the resource and a stack trace for identifying the malicious code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4282) Can't create a root context web app
by Stan Silvert (JIRA)
Can't create a root context web app
-----------------------------------
Key: JBAS-4282
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4282
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Web (Tomcat) service
Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta2
Reporter: Stan Silvert
Assigned To: Remy Maucherat
I am unable to deploy a web app as root context using the instructions here:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SetupARootContextApp
One thing that is unclear is if ROOT.war "must" be removed from /deploy. In 4.2, root context web apps do not require removal of ROOT.war. IMHO, this is how it should work. If you deploy a WAR as the root context, it should simply override whatever was there before.
If ROOT.war is removed, 5.0 will allow a root context web app as long as it is deployed from an EAR and specified as such in application.xml. Otherwise, it will fail.
If you choose to deploy a stand-alone WAR and specify it as root context using jboss-web.xml, it will always fail - regardless of whether or not you remove ROOT.war.
I have committed a test for root deployment in both 4.2 and 5.0. The test passes in 4.2, but not in 5.0. You can run it with:
build one-test -Dtest=org.jboss.test.web.test.RootContextUnitTestCase
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-494) Investigate marshalling format to simplify wireshark / ethereal plugin
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
Investigate marshalling format to simplify wireshark / ethereal plugin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-494
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-494
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assigned To: Bela Ban
Fix For: 2.5
Currently, parsing JGroups network data via wireshark is difficult:
- message lists don't have (a) total number of bytes and (b) bytes/message and
- headers don't have (a) total bytes for all headers and (b) bytes / header
Investigate whether we can change the marshalling format to accommodate the wireshark plugin. This has the nice side effect that the JGroups wire format becomes standardized, ie. each header has the same format. This allows us to display a header even if we don't know how to parse it. In this case, we'd simply display the name and number of bytes.
Caveat: we want to avoid having to make messages bigger when marshalled.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 12 months