[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-451) Allow optional trailing comma "," for field constraint list
by Juergen none (JIRA)
Allow optional trailing comma "," for field constraint list
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-451
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-451
Project: JBoss Rules
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 3.0.4
Reporter: Juergen none
Assigned To: Mark Proctor
…
[View More]Priority: Optional
With frequently re-arranging / adding / removing field constraints, I more than once forgot to add / remove trailing/separating commas in the field constraint list.
would it be possible to extend the drools drl syntax to allow an optional trailing comma?
e.g.
A(
a == 1,
b == 2, // optional trailing comma, should not yield the syntax error
)
A(
a == 1,
b == 2 // no (optional) trailing comma, like currently required, is also valid
)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[View Less]
17 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-969) To be able to access globals within functions
by Natraj Gudla (JIRA)
To be able to access globals within functions
---------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-969
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-969
Project: JBoss Rules
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: All
Environment: Drools version 3.0.6, Using Eclipse IDE and simple DRL file working with Global variables
Reporter: Natraj Gudla
…
[View More]Assigned To: Mark Proctor
Hello,
I am using Drools 3.0.6. While using a global variable in a function, the compiler complains it cannot resolve the global variable name. Something like below
global com.sample.ExampleLogger customLogger;
function void logMessage(String msg){
customLogger.logMessage("Log Message from the function");
}
In the above code, it complains "customLogger cannot be resolved". I am able to refer the global in the consequence of a rule directly. What is the problem using the reference within a function.
On the other hand, i am able to do something like
function void logMessage(ExampleLogger custLogger,String msg){
custLogger.logMessage(msg+" Accept gloabal as function parameter");
}
and call from the consequence of a rule : logMessage(customLogger); // I am passing the global to the function as an argument and then use it to log a message.
This way is working. But not the first way of using the global in the function. It would be a good feature to have the globals accessible within functions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[View Less]
17 years, 6 months