[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8501) Support for file system hot deployment of exploded archives
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Support for file system hot deployment of exploded archives
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8501
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8501
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Deployers
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.0.0.M2
Basic JBAS-8357 solution deals with zipped archives. We also want to support exploded archives.
My thought is the scanner will inform the deployment repo of the new content. The repo instead of persisting a a1/b2c3xxxx/content file will persist a a1/b2c3xxxxx/url file that includes the URL of the exploded content in the hot deploy dir. When the repo is asked for the deployment, it will find the "url" file and use it to find the actual deployment content in the hot deploy dir. (It can actually keep this information in memory; the "url" file is to allow the connection to survive restart).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-563) Consolidate state transfer API to use streams
by Vladimir Blagojevic (JIRA)
Consolidate state transfer API to use streams
---------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-563
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-563
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Vladimir Blagojevic
Assigned To: Vladimir Blagojevic
Fix For: 3.0
Although streaming state transfer has its advantages over byte based state transfer, byte based state transfer is absolutely necessary since streaming based transfer relies on plain sockets that are not firewall friendly. However, that does not mean that we cannot consolidate state transfer API at application level and mask byte based transfer with streams. We have already done this in JBC 2.0 so there is no reason not to do it on JGroups level as well.
Advantages:
- simpler state transfer API
- interchangeable state transfer mechanism without affect on application
- simplification of client application
Disadvantages:
- we break current API by eliminating getState(byte[]) and setState(byte [])
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 8 months