[JBoss JIRA] Created: (AS7-1026) add-jms-queue --help does not work inside a batch
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
add-jms-queue --help does not work inside a batch
-------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-1026
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1026
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: CLI
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta3
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
[standalone@localhost:9999 subsystem=messaging] batch
[standalone@localhost:9999 subsystem=messaging #] add-
add-data-source add-jms-cf add-jms-queue add-jms-topic
add-xa-data-source
[standalone@localhost:9999 subsystem=messaging #] add-jms-
add-jms-cf add-jms-queue add-jms-topic
[standalone@localhost:9999 subsystem=messaging #] add-jms-queue --help
Failed to add to batch: Required argument '--name' is missing.
Discard the batch (or don't start one at all) and it works fine.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSER-119) Ensure compatibility with Trove
by Christian Effertz (JIRA)
Ensure compatibility with Trove
-------------------------------
Key: JBSER-119
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSER-119
Project: JBoss Serialization
Issue Type: Thirdparty Change
Affects Versions: 1.0.3 GA
Reporter: Christian Effertz
Assignee: Clebert Suconic
Fix For: 1.1.0 Beta
The version of [Trove|http://trove4j.sourceforge.net] that is shipped with the latest version of JBoss Serialization is quite old. Trove has had a major release since it was bundled last time for Version 1.0.3 and seems to be facing a next major version 3.0.
As it is stated in their release notes that they had some performance improvements and Bug Fixes I would assume that JBoss Serialization would profit in terms of stability and performance if using the newer versions.
I will give it a try in our dev system, but it would be more comforting to get a statement if your testsuite turned green if using the newer version.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (AS7-1291) UserTransaction not exposed in JDNI
by Juergen Zimmermann (JIRA)
UserTransaction not exposed in JDNI
-----------------------------------
Key: AS7-1291
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1291
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Naming
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Final
Environment: 7.1.0.Alpha1 Jenkins build 1402
Reporter: Juergen Zimmermann
Assignee: John Bailey
In JBoss 6 UserTransaction was exposed in JNDI named as java:comp/UserTransaction. Thus an Arquillian test method could be encapsulated in one single transaction:
* lookup() the UserTransaction
* begin() inside @Before
* commit() inside @After
Unfortunately, JBoss 7 doesn't have a JNDI entry for UserTransaction.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-9049) Need way to override the boot.log in start scripts
by Scott Stark (JIRA)
Need way to override the boot.log in start scripts
--------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-9049
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9049
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Logging
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta1
Reporter: Scott Stark
Assignee: David Lloyd
We need the ability to specify the location of the boot.log. Right now the boot.log location is specified via the org.jboss.boot.log.file java system property, but this is always set to $JBOSS_HOME/standalone/log/boot.log in the server start scripts. This should either not be set and simply default to $JBOSS_HOME/standalone/log/boot.log when unset so that it may be passed into the jvm, or, we need a JBOSS_BOOT_LOG env property that can override this value along the line of:
if [ "x$JBOSS_BOOT_LOG" = "x" ]; then
JBOSS_BOOT_LOG="$JBOSS_HOME/standalone/log/boot.log"
fi
while true; do
if [ "x$LAUNCH_JBOSS_IN_BACKGROUND" = "x" ]; then
# Execute the JVM in the foreground
eval \"$JAVA\" $JAVA_OPTS \
\"-Dorg.jboss.boot.log.file=$JBOSS_BOOT_LOG\" \
...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-1330) EJB timer service should use a thread pool to avoid OOM
by Galder Zamarreno (JIRA)
EJB timer service should use a thread pool to avoid OOM
-------------------------------------------------------
Key: EJBTHREE-1330
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1330
Project: EJB 3.0
Issue Type: Bug
Components: pool
Affects Versions: AS 4.2.2.GA
Reporter: Galder Zamarreno
Assigned To: Galder Zamarreno
Priority: Minor
The default EJB timer service used by the EJB3 layer is based on
org.jboss.ejb3.timerservice.jboss.JBossTimerServiceFactory which delegates
to the standard org.jboss.ejb.txtimer.EJBTimerService.
For EJB3 beans using the EJB timer service the thread local pool should not be used.
Since the current EJB timer service creates a new thread for each timer being created, the
thread local pool will create a matching instance of the bean for that thread. Thus the number
of active instances in total can effectively grow unchecked and thus an OOM will occur.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-2166) no-interface view implementation based on MC constructs is brittle
by jaikiran pai (JIRA)
no-interface view implementation based on MC constructs is brittle
------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: EJBTHREE-2166
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/EJBTHREE-2166
Project: EJB 3.0
Issue Type: Bug
Components: nointerface
Affects Versions: depchain-1.0.0-alpha-4
Reporter: jaikiran pai
Assignee: jaikiran pai
Currently the no-interface view proxy that gets bound into JNDI, internally uses a KernelControllerContext (MC construct) corresponding to the endpoint container of the EJB. The proxy depends just on DESCRIBED state of the endpoint. The invocation handler of that proxy, on first invocation, pushes the context to INSTALLED state (if not already in INSTALLED stated) and then invokes on the endpoint.
This approach won't work out because MC returns an UnModifiable kernel controller context which throws an exception when we try to change the state of that context. More on this in the "Important" note at the end of this MC chapter http://docs.jboss.org/jbossmc/docs/2.0.x/userGuide/ch11s04.html:
<quote>
All context information is wrapped into unmodifiable objects to prevent the user from changing anything outside of the microcontainer's control.
</quote>
It's just plain luck that no-interface view works currently, because the first invocation on the nointerface view happens after the context has already been set to INSTALLED state by MC.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 11 months