July 2011 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-816) TP: avoid copying when receiving data

by Bela Ban (JIRA)

TP: avoid copying when receiving data ------------------------------------- Key: JGRP-816 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-816 Project: JGroups Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Bela Ban Assignee: Bela Ban Fix For: 2.8 Currently, we receive data into a byte[] buffer, e.g. from DatagramSocket.receive(), but then have to COPY buffer when passing it to a worker from the thread pool. The copy is needed because the next DatargamSocket.receive() will overwrite the contents of buffer, and if the worker thread is still unmarshalling the data from the buffer, it might read corrupt contents. To overcome this, investigate the following: - Every worker thread has it own buffer - When the thread has been idle for N seconds and is removed from the pool, that buffer will be discarded - We create DatagramChannels from the socket(s) (DatagramSocket, MulticastSocket or Socket) - A selector is called when new data is available on the socket - The key returned by the selector points to the right channel - We pass the channel to a thread pool worker thread and continue with the select() loop - The worker then reads the data into its own buffer, unmarshalls it and passed it up the stack ==> No copy of the buffer is required as the thread's buffer is available until the message has been processed (usually until message unmarshalling) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

2
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-886) TCP: single implementation based on NIO

by Bela Ban (JIRA)

TCP: single implementation based on NIO --------------------------------------- Key: JGRP-886 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-886 Project: JGroups Issue Type: Task Reporter: Bela Ban Assignee: Bela Ban Fix For: 2.8 Merge TCP and TCP_NIO into one protocol. Adapt it to use NIO2 (when available). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

3
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-1225) Removed BasicConnectionTable

by Bela Ban (JIRA)

Removed BasicConnectionTable ---------------------------- Key: JGRP-1225 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1225 Project: JGroups Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Bela Ban Assignee: Bela Ban Fix For: 3.0 Currently still used by TCP_NIO (ConnectionTableNIO). When we move to NIO2, we can drop this class, as it will be obsolete -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-902) InvocationRequest need SSLSession for certificates and principal in sslsocket transport

by ya xiang (JIRA)

InvocationRequest need SSLSession for certificates and principal in sslsocket transport --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBREM-902 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-902 Project: JBoss Remoting Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: security Reporter: ya xiang In a SSL context, there is a real need for check principal and certificates. There are ways to do this, but current jboss remoting not provide it, just provider socket remote address as sessionId. seems not enough. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

2
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-1138) JBREM-1127 - ClassCastExceptions arising from Unmarsharller/Classloader caching in MicroRemoteClientInvoker

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

JBREM-1127 - ClassCastExceptions arising from Unmarsharller/Classloader caching in MicroRemoteClientInvoker ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBREM-1138 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-1138 Project: JBoss Remoting Issue Type: Support Patch Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Galder Zamarreño Assignee: Galder Zamarreño Port JBREM-1127 to a one-off patch so that classloading issues are avoided with paralell isolated EAR invocations using different versions of same class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-1169) Bisocket connection won't be closed if pulling out the ethernet cable between client and server. The failure detection code won't close the failure connection, as a result, the subsequent requests will hang after connection account exceeds the threshold

by mingjun jiang (JIRA)

Bisocket connection won't be closed if pulling out the ethernet cable between client and server. The failure detection code won't close the failure connection, as a result, the subsequent requests will hang after connection account exceeds the threshold ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBREM-1169 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-1169 Project: JBoss Remoting Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: detection Affects Versions: 2.2.3.SP1 Environment: OS: Windows Server 2003. JBoss App Server 4.2.3.GA, JBoss Messaging 1.4.5 GA, JBoss Remoting 2.2.3 SP1 Reporter: mingjun jiang We are using JBoss App Server 4.2.3.GA, JBoss Messaging 1.4.5 GA and JBoss Remoting 2.2.3 SP1. In our application, there are a lot of Message listeners running on the client side, these message listeners will receive messages from queue/topic deployed in JBoss Messaging Configuration: We created our own JMS Connection factory which uses the default remoting connector. As you know, the default remoting connector is configured to use the bisocket transport. We didn't change the default value of the remoting connector During we run our application, we open the JBoss web console to monitor the value of currentClientPoolSize under "Jboss.remoting" JMX MBean. How to reproduce this issue: 1. Run 5 message listeners in the client side to receive messages from JBoss Messaging, then we observe the value of currentClientPoolSize is 10 2. After processing several messages, we manually pull out the ethernet cable. The value of currentClientPoolSize is still 10. 3. We run another 5 message listeners in client side, then the value of currentClientPoolSize will become 20 4. After we do the same operations above several times, the value of currentClientPoolSize will increase continuously. Once the value of currentClientPoolSize is equal to the MaxPoolSize, then the subsequent incoming client requests will hang, and we will encounter the following exception in server side 2009-10-20 18:08:09,655 ERROR [org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread] Worker thread initialization failure java.net.SocketException: Connection reset at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:168) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:235) at java.io.FilterInputStream.read(FilterInputStream.java:66) at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.readVersion(ServerThread.java:859) at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.processInvocation(ServerThread.java:545) at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.dorun(ServerThread.java:406) at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.run(ServerThread.java:173) Conclusion: JBoss Messaging won't close the failure connections if they are caused by manually pulling out ethernet cable. As a result, the value of currentClientPoolSize will increase continuously and finally the new client requests will hang Note: If we killed the process of message listener in client side, then the value of currentClientPoolSize will decrease to 0 immediately, it seems that the server could detect the failure connection and perform the corresponding resource releasing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

4
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-1054) Annotation to automatically return new transporters types

by David Lloyd (JIRA)

Annotation to automatically return new transporters types --------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBREM-1054 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-1054 Project: JBoss Remoting Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: r3 api Reporter: David Lloyd Priority: Optional Fix For: 3.1.0.Beta1 It would be cool if a transporter interface (or an implementing class of that interface) could have methods which sport an annotation that indicates that the return value of that method, if it is an interface, should be automatically wrapped into a transporter (if invoked via a transporter). This way, complex remote object structures can be easily created and used. Also handy would be a simple way of notating such methods when the interface and implementation are already existent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

3
14
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-857) transporterclient not thread-safe for failover

by craig bordelon (JIRA)

transporterclient not thread-safe for failover ---------------------------------------------- Key: JBREM-857 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-857 Project: JBoss Remoting Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: transporter Affects Versions: 1.4.6.GA Environment: solaris 10 and java 5 Reporter: craig bordelon Fix For: 2.2.2.GA_CP02 the jboss 1.4.1 transporterclient used by multithreaded program was giving strange results on a clustered server when failing over so i found lack of synchronization in the code. I made these changes and seems to be helping. changes to TransporterClient.java. I would like this fixed in the 2.x and 3.x versions (hello developers). I think i know how to fix the 2.x version of this code too as it has some new stuff but is likewise broken. (developers send me an email to bord(a)iscp.telcordia.com if you need it. thx Craig) @@ -93,11 +93,12 @@ /** * Disconnects the remoting client */ - private void disconnect() + private synchronized void disconnect() { if(remotingClient != null) { remotingClient.disconnect(); + remotingClient = null; } } @@ -232,14 +233,18 @@ do { + Client rcl = null; + synchronized(this) { rcl = remotingClient; } + if (rcl == null) throw new CannotConnectException("Client has been dis connected."); try { failOver = false; - response = remotingClient.invoke(request); + response = rcl.invoke(request); } catch(CannotConnectException cnc) { - failOver = findAlternativeTarget(); + failOver = findAlternativeTarget(rcl); + if (log.isDebugEnabled()) log.error("on CannotConnectException failO ver is "+failOver+" for "+rcl.getInvoker().getLocator()); if(!failOver) { throw cnc; @@ -264,7 +269,7 @@ * * @return */ - private boolean findAlternativeTarget() + private boolean findAlternativeTarget(Client rcl) { boolean failover = false; @@ -287,12 +292,19 @@ { // finally found server with target handler InvokerLocator newLocator = data.getInvokerLocator(); - if(!remotingClient.getInvoker().getLocator().equals(new Locator)) + if(!rcl.getInvoker().getLocator().equals(newLocator)) { try { - remotingClient = new Client(newLocator); - remotingClient.connect(); + synchronized(this) { + if (rcl == remotingClient) { + disconnect(); + remotingClient = new Client(newLocator); + } + //otherwise have to assume some other thread + //has meanwhile changed it + //including even disconnecting + } return true; } catch(Exception e) @@ -300,6 +312,8 @@ log.warn("Problem connecting to newly found alter nate target.", e); } } + else if (log.isDebugEnabled()) + log.error(rcl.getInvoker().getLocator()+" == "+newLoc ator); } } } @@ -333,4 +347,4 @@ } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-906) NoSuchObjectException on Server Restart Using RMI Transport & Unified Invoker

by John Reynolds (JIRA)

NoSuchObjectException on Server Restart Using RMI Transport & Unified Invoker ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBREM-906 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-906 Project: JBoss Remoting Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: unifiedinvoker Affects Versions: 2.2.2.GA Environment: Server Running Windows XP or Redhat - Swing Client on Windows XP Reporter: John Reynolds Using a Swing client to connect to the JBoss server, configured with RMI Transport Connector and Unified Invoker, I receive the following StackTrace when, after successfully connecting to the server and executing a few EJB transactions, I shut the server down and then bring it back up. Upon attempting to do any further invocations, it appears cached information is causing the client to fail. ------------- (rmi.RMIClientInvoker 272 ) java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: no such object in table galaxy.framework.model.domain.services.util.SLCommunicationException: Error making invocation in RMI client invoker. at galaxy.framework.model.domain.services.util.ServiceLocator.authenticateUser(ServiceLocator.java:738) at galaxy.framework.model.domain.services.util.ServiceLocator.initializeWithLDAP(ServiceLocator.java:435) at galaxy.application.view.swing.presentation.util.ClientConnectionManager$1.run(ClientConnectionManager.java:51) Caused by: org.jboss.remoting.CannotConnectException: Error making invocation in RMI client invoker. at org.jboss.remoting.transport.rmi.RMIClientInvoker.transport(RMIClientInvoker.java:273) at org.jboss.remoting.MicroRemoteClientInvoker.invoke(MicroRemoteClientInvoker.java:122) at org.jboss.remoting.Client.invoke(Client.java:1550) at org.jboss.remoting.Client.invoke(Client.java:530) at org.jboss.invocation.unified.interfaces.UnifiedInvokerProxy.invoke(UnifiedInvokerProxy.java:183) at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invokeInvoker(InvokerInterceptor.java:365) at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:197) at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:61) at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:70) at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.StatelessSessionInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInterceptor.java:112) at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:100) at $Proxy1.authenticateSwingUserWithLDAP(Unknown Source) at galaxy.framework.model.domain.services.util.ServiceLocator.authenticateUser(ServiceLocator.java:725) ... 2 more Caused by: java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: no such object in table at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:247) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:223) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:126) at org.jboss.remoting.transport.rmi.RMIServerInvoker_Stub.transport(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.remoting.transport.rmi.RMIClientInvoker.transport(RMIClientInvoker.java:238) ... 14 more ------------ Seems potentially similar to this issue fixed in 4.0.5 in non-remoting-RMI code: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=116027 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-802) TransporterHandler should not use Class.forName

by Julien Viet (JIRA)

TransporterHandler should not use Class.forName ----------------------------------------------- Key: JBREM-802 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-802 Project: JBoss Remoting Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: transporter Affects Versions: 2.2.1.GA, 2.2.0.SP4 Reporter: Julien Viet line: classSig[x] = Class.forName(sig[x]); should probably be replaced by classSig[x] = targetPOJO.getClass().getClassLoader().loadClass(sig[x]); to provide a correct class lookup -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

4
4
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira July 2011