[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-193) Need support for notification generatoin from within ActionProcessor.process method
by Tom Fennelly (JIRA)
Need support for notification generatoin from within ActionProcessor.process method
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-193
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-193
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 4.1
Reporter: Tom Fennelly
Assigned To: Mark Little
Fix For: 4.1
In version 4.0, the Action Processing pipeline management code raises notifications in response to an exception from the ActionProcessor.process method. The pipeline managemnt code calls the getOkNotification (no exception) or getErrorNotification (exception) to get the notification message.
For many reasons, this is a very flawed model. Notifications should be raised from within the process method by means of attaching the notifications (error or otherwise) to the message (the mechanism is a design issue). Once the process method returns, the pipline processing management code can check the message for notifications. If there are errors, it can/should (?) abort the message processing, send the error notification (by whatever notification options are configured on the listener) and signal the failure to the calling process (by whatever failure config is configured on the listener).
The getOk and getErro methods can then be removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2 weeks, 6 days
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-1257) ENCRYPT protocol UnrecoverableKeyException: Given final block not properly padded
by Andres Garcia Garcia (JIRA)
ENCRYPT protocol UnrecoverableKeyException: Given final block not properly padded
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1257
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1257
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.11, 2.8, 2.7
Environment: Windows XP SP3, Java 1.6
Reporter: Andres Garcia Garcia
Assignee: Bela Ban
Recently I updated my jgroups version from 2.4.x to 2.11. Suddenly my applications thrown this exception.
org.jgroups.ChannelException: unable to setup the protocol stack: Given final block not properly padded
at org.jgroups.JChannel.init(JChannel.java:1574)
at org.jgroups.JChannel.<init>(JChannel.java:257)
at org.jgroups.JChannel.<init>(JChannel.java:240)
at org.jgroups.demos.Draw.<init>(Draw.java:52)
at org.jgroups.demos.Draw.main(Draw.java:141)
Caused by: java.security.UnrecoverableKeyException: Given final block not properly padded
at com.sun.crypto.provider.SunJCE_z.a(DashoA13*..)
at com.sun.crypto.provider.JceKeyStore.engineGetKey(DashoA13*..)
at java.security.KeyStore.getKey(Unknown Source)
at org.jgroups.protocols.ENCRYPT.initConfiguredKey(ENCRYPT.java:269)
at org.jgroups.protocols.ENCRYPT.init(ENCRYPT.java:231)
at org.jgroups.stack.ProtocolStack.initProtocolStack(ProtocolStack.java:641)
at org.jgroups.stack.ProtocolStack.setup(ProtocolStack.java:468)
at org.jgroups.JChannel.init(JChannel.java:1570)
... 4 more
The ENCRYPT protocol config is
<ENCRYPT sym_init="448"
sym_algorithm="Blowfish"
encrypt_entire_message="true"
key_store_name="cloudencrypt.keystore"
store_password="password"
alias="test"/>
I tested the same code with different versions. 2.6.15 GA is the last working version, and every version I tested from 2.7 GA to 2.11 GA throw the same exception. I made a little use case with it. Maybe I am missing something?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3 weeks, 1 day
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (AS7-782) Hudson/Jenkins won't work in AS7b3
by Fred Bricon (JIRA)
Hudson/Jenkins won't work in AS7b3
----------------------------------
Key: AS7-782
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-782
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta3
Environment: Fedora 14, JDK 1.6.0_24, JBoss AS7 beta 3
Reporter: Fred Bricon
Assignee: Jason Greene
After patching AS7b3 with the latest jboss-vfs from github/master and
deploying hudson ( http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/jvnet/hudson/main/huds...) or jenkins on AS7, an exception is thrown when accessing the homepage (or any page) :
{noformat}
17:39:33,429 ERROR [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[localhost].[/hudson-war-2.0.0].[Stapler]] (http-localhost.localdomain-127.0.0.1-8080-2) "Servlet.service()" pour la servlet Stapler a généré une exception: java.net.MalformedURLException: unknown protocol: jndi
at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:574) [:1.6.0_24]
at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:464) [:1.6.0_24]
at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:413) [:1.6.0_24]
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.selectResourceByLocale(Stapler.java:227) [stapler-1.155.jar:]
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.openResourcePathByLocale(Stapler.java:203) [stapler-1.155.jar:]
at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.service(Stapler.java:145) [stapler-1.155.jar:]
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:847) [jboss-servlet-api_3.0_spec-1.0.0.Final.jar:1.0.0.Final]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:324) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:242) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:94) [hudson-core-2.0.0.jar:]
at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:86) [hudson-core-2.0.0.jar:]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:274) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:242) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at hudson.security.csrf.CrumbFilter.doFilter(CrumbFilter.java:47) [hudson-core-2.0.0.jar:]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:274) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:242) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at hudson.security.HudsonFilter.doFilter(HudsonFilter.java:162) [hudson-core-2.0.0.jar:]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:274) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:242) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at hudson.util.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilter(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:81) [hudson-core-2.0.0.jar:]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:274) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:242) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:275) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:161) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:388) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:154) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:362) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:877) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:658) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:951) [jbossweb-7.0.0.Beta11.jar:7.0.0.Beta3]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) [:1.6.0_24]
{noformat}
I first mentioned this issur on irc (see http://echelog.matzon.dk/logs/browse/jboss-as7/1305151200 [13:42:43] -> [13:48:58])
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3 weeks, 4 days
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-457) Optimization: make threads return immediately if NAKACK has another active thread for the same sender
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
Optimization: make threads return immediately if NAKACK has another active thread for the same sender
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-457
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-457
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assigned To: Bela Ban
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.5
In NAKACK, when a thread places a message for sender S into the NakReceiverWindow NRW, it subsequently acquires a lock on NRW (lock by sender) and removes as many messages as possible and passes them up.
If many threads do this at the same time, all threads but one are blocked, and - when finally unblocked - usually return. This causes context switches and possibly cache flushing, so a better way would be to have the threads check whether another thread is already removing messages using a CAS operation *before* acquiring the lock.
The effect should be that no threads will wait on the lock unnecessarily, and thus fewer context switches, and more threads available to the pool.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3 months, 4 weeks
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6255) Memory leak caused by endless piling up of delete-on-exit hooks for JMX authentication challenges
by Taras Tielkes (JIRA)
Taras Tielkes created AS7-6255:
----------------------------------
Summary: Memory leak caused by endless piling up of delete-on-exit hooks for JMX authentication challenges
Key: AS7-6255
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6255
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JMX
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Taras Tielkes
Assignee: Stuart Douglas
We're running 7.1.1, with a patch applied for REMJMX-45 to limit the worst leaks coming from the JMX subsystem.
However, even with this patch applied we can only survive for a few days in a production-like scenario.
Inspection of the out-of-memory heap dumps shows a large accumulation of entries inside {{java.io.DeleteOnExitHook}}, all having values like "{{C:\jars\jboss-as-7.1.1.Final\standalone\tmp\auth\challenge-4303257}}".
Given sufficient JMX connections made to a running instance of 7.1.1, this will at some point exhaust the JVM heap. Typically the paths will be longer than the example above, accelerating the process.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6254) Memory leak caused by retained connection ids in RemotingConnectorServer superclass
by Taras Tielkes (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Taras Tielkes updated AS7-6254:
-------------------------------
Description:
We're running 7.1.1, with a patch applied for REMJMX-45 to limit the worst leaks coming from the JMX subsystem.
However, even with this patch applied we can only survive for a few days in a production-like scenario.
It seems that {{org.jboss.remotingjmx.RemotingConnectorServer}} never calls the {{connectionClosed()}}/{{connectionFailed()}} methods in its superclass.
As such, the connection ids that are stored in the field {{javax.management.remote.JMXConnectorServer#connectionIds}} are never released.
Given sufficient connections made to a running instance of 7.1.1 (for example, various monitoring tools), an out-of-memory end-state is inevitable.
was:
We're running 7.1.1, with a patch applied for REMJMX-45 to limit the worst leaks coming from the JMX subsystem.
However, even with this patch applied we can only survive for a few days in a production-like scenario.
It seems that {{org.jboss.remotingjmx.RemotingConnectorServer}} never calls the {{connectionClosed()}}/{{connectionFailed()}} methods in its superclass.
As such, the connection ids that are stored in the field {{javax.management.remote.JMXConnectorServer#connectionIds}} are never released.
Given sufficient connections make to a running instance of 7.1.1 (for example, various monitoring tools), an out-of-memory end-state is inevitable.
> Memory leak caused by retained connection ids in RemotingConnectorServer superclass
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6254
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6254
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMX
> Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
> Reporter: Taras Tielkes
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
>
> We're running 7.1.1, with a patch applied for REMJMX-45 to limit the worst leaks coming from the JMX subsystem.
> However, even with this patch applied we can only survive for a few days in a production-like scenario.
> It seems that {{org.jboss.remotingjmx.RemotingConnectorServer}} never calls the {{connectionClosed()}}/{{connectionFailed()}} methods in its superclass.
> As such, the connection ids that are stored in the field {{javax.management.remote.JMXConnectorServer#connectionIds}} are never released.
> Given sufficient connections made to a running instance of 7.1.1 (for example, various monitoring tools), an out-of-memory end-state is inevitable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6254) Memory leak caused by retained connection ids in RemotingConnectorServer superclass
by Taras Tielkes (JIRA)
Taras Tielkes created AS7-6254:
----------------------------------
Summary: Memory leak caused by retained connection ids in RemotingConnectorServer superclass
Key: AS7-6254
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6254
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JMX
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Taras Tielkes
Assignee: Stuart Douglas
We're running 7.1.1, with a patch applied for REMJMX-45 to limit the worst leaks coming from the JMX subsystem.
However, even with this patch applied we can only survive for a few days in a production-like scenario.
It seems that {{org.jboss.remotingjmx.RemotingConnectorServer}} never calls the {{connectionClosed()}}/{{connectionFailed()}} methods in its superclass.
As such, the connection ids that are stored in the field {{javax.management.remote.JMXConnectorServer#connectionIds}} are never released.
Given sufficient connections make to a running instance of 7.1.1 (for example, various monitoring tools), an out-of-memory end-state is inevitable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (JBAS-9526) High CPU with lots of Waiting threads on JIoEndpoint$Worker on version 5.0.1
by shikhar khanna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
shikhar khanna updated JBAS-9526:
---------------------------------
Description:
High CPU with lots of Waiting threads on JIoEndpoint$Worker on version 5.0.1
- Running a 100 user load test on JBoss 5.0.1.
- Getting High CPU
- Analyzed thread dumps and found almost 50-60% threads are waiting as per below snippet\
Thread Name : http-0.0.0.0-8080-8 State : in Object.wait() Java Stack at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on [0x24d875d0] (a org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.await(JIoEndpoint.java:416) - locked [0x24d875d0] (a org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:442) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> High CPU with lots of Waiting threads on JIoEndpoint$Worker on version 5.0.1
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-9526
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9526
> Project: Application Server 3 4 5 and 6
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Reporter: shikhar khanna
>
> High CPU with lots of Waiting threads on JIoEndpoint$Worker on version 5.0.1
> - Running a 100 user load test on JBoss 5.0.1.
> - Getting High CPU
> - Analyzed thread dumps and found almost 50-60% threads are waiting as per below snippet\
> Thread Name : http-0.0.0.0-8080-8 State : in Object.wait() Java Stack at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on [0x24d875d0] (a org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.await(JIoEndpoint.java:416) - locked [0x24d875d0] (a org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:442) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month