[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2453) Expose statistics configuration attribute per JGroups protocol
by Paul Ferraro (JIRA)
Paul Ferraro created WFLY-2453:
----------------------------------
Summary: Expose statistics configuration attribute per JGroups protocol
Key: WFLY-2453
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2453
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Enhancement
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Paul Ferraro
By default, every JGroups protocol gathers statistics. Currently, this can be disabled per protocol via:
<property name="stats">false</property>
This is a bit cumbersome. Also, a standard property like this should be 1st class attribute of the <protocol/> element.
e.g..
<protocol type="..." statistics="false"/>
We may also want to add the ability to disable statistics per stack, so the user does not have to explicitly disable it in every protocol. That way, to enable statistics for a single protocol, one could use:
<stack name="udp" statistics="false"><!-- Disables collection of statistics for all protocols -->
<transport type="UDP" statistics="true"/><!-- Enables collection of statistics for just this protocol -->
...
</stack>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2427) Launcher API
by Ondrej Zizka (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Ondrej Zizka updated WFLY-2427:
-------------------------------
Description:
1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
java.lang.Process launch()
Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
HOWEVER...
Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
Example of EAP 6.0 launch:
VM arguments:
-server -Xms64m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=3600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000 -Djboss.modules.system.pkgs=org.jboss.byteman -Djava.awt.headless=true "-Dorg.jboss.boot.log.file=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/log/boot.log" "-Dlogging.configuration=file:/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/configuration/logging.properties" "-Djboss.home.dir=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0"
Program argument:
-mp "/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/modules" -jaxpmodule javax.xml.jaxp-provider org.jboss.as.standalone -b localhost --server-config=standalone.xml
was:
1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
java.lang.Process launch()
Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
HOWEVER...
Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
> Launcher API
> ------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2427
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
>
> 1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
> 2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
> 3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
> What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
> So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
> java.lang.Process launch()
> Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
> HOWEVER...
> Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
> So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
> I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
> Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
> Example of EAP 6.0 launch:
> VM arguments:
> -server -Xms64m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=3600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000 -Djboss.modules.system.pkgs=org.jboss.byteman -Djava.awt.headless=true "-Dorg.jboss.boot.log.file=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/log/boot.log" "-Dlogging.configuration=file:/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/configuration/logging.properties" "-Djboss.home.dir=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0"
> Program argument:
> -mp "/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/modules" -jaxpmodule javax.xml.jaxp-provider org.jboss.as.standalone -b localhost --server-config=standalone.xml
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2427) Launcher API
by Ondrej Zizka (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Ondrej Zizka updated WFLY-2427:
-------------------------------
Description:
1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
java.lang.Process launch()
Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
h2. HOWEVER...
Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
h2. Example of EAP 6.0 launch:
VM arguments:
-server -Xms64m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=3600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000 -Djboss.modules.system.pkgs=org.jboss.byteman -Djava.awt.headless=true "-Dorg.jboss.boot.log.file=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/log/boot.log" "-Dlogging.configuration=file:/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/configuration/logging.properties" "-Djboss.home.dir=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0"
Program argument:
-mp "/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/modules" -jaxpmodule javax.xml.jaxp-provider org.jboss.as.standalone -b localhost --server-config=standalone.xml
was:
1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
java.lang.Process launch()
Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
HOWEVER...
Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
Example of EAP 6.0 launch:
VM arguments:
-server -Xms64m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=3600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000 -Djboss.modules.system.pkgs=org.jboss.byteman -Djava.awt.headless=true "-Dorg.jboss.boot.log.file=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/log/boot.log" "-Dlogging.configuration=file:/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/configuration/logging.properties" "-Djboss.home.dir=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0"
Program argument:
-mp "/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/modules" -jaxpmodule javax.xml.jaxp-provider org.jboss.as.standalone -b localhost --server-config=standalone.xml
> Launcher API
> ------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2427
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
>
> 1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
> 2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
> 3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
> What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
> So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
> java.lang.Process launch()
> Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
> h2. HOWEVER...
> Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
> So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
> I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
> Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
> h2. Example of EAP 6.0 launch:
> VM arguments:
> -server -Xms64m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=3600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000 -Djboss.modules.system.pkgs=org.jboss.byteman -Djava.awt.headless=true "-Dorg.jboss.boot.log.file=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/log/boot.log" "-Dlogging.configuration=file:/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/standalone/configuration/logging.properties" "-Djboss.home.dir=/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0"
> Program argument:
> -mp "/Users/max/products/runtimes/jboss-eap-6.0/modules" -jaxpmodule javax.xml.jaxp-provider org.jboss.as.standalone -b localhost --server-config=standalone.xml
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2427) Launcher API
by Ondrej Zizka (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Ondrej Zizka commented on WFLY-2427:
------------------------------------
What's the input for Eclipse API?
To what extent should this go - in terms of reflecting all those system props by which various subsystems and deps may be affected? Maybe the known issues workarounds could be adressed by the API.
Other thing: Should this be a separate project, aiming to be backward compatible with older WildFly's, or would it be simply tied to WildFly releases and guaranteed to work with just that version?
> Launcher API
> ------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2427
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
>
> 1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
> 2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
> 3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
> What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
> So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
> java.lang.Process launch()
> Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
> HOWEVER...
> Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
> So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
> I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
> Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2427) Launcher API
by Ondrej Zizka (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Ondrej Zizka edited comment on WFLY-2427 at 11/6/13 2:26 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
What's the input for Eclipse API?
To what extent should this go - in terms of reflecting all those system props by which various subsystems and deps may be affected? Maybe the known issues workarounds could be adressed by the API.
Other thing: Should this be a separate project, aiming to be backward compatible with older WildFly's, or would it be simply tied to WildFly releases and guaranteed to work with just that version?
was (Author: ozizka):
What's the input for Eclipse API?
To what extent should this go - in terms of reflecting all those system props by which various subsystems and deps may be affected? Maybe the known issues workarounds could be adressed by the API.
Other thing: Should this be a separate project, aiming to be backward compatible with older WildFly's, or would it be simply tied to WildFly releases and guaranteed to work with just that version?
> Launcher API
> ------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2427
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2427
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
>
> 1) The AS should have some sort of API for launching our processes so tools that want a process have a clear contract instead of having to guess at what's relevant in our ever-changing scripts.
> 2) We want the main class in our process launch to be what's invoked by java -jar jboss-modules.jar. We don't want java -jar jboss-as-launcher.jar which does some stuff and then calls org.jboss.modules.Main.
> 3) JBoss Modules itself shouldn't have a lot of the stuff in it that's relevant to an AS launcher API, because many of those things are not relevant to JBoss Modules in a generic sense.
> What we could do though is provide a launcher lib that isn't involved at all in our normal boot. Something that would only be used by tools that want to launch a separate, i.e. non-embedded, AS process.
> So, some sort of stable configuration API and then a simple
> java.lang.Process launch()
> Basically, a utility that does the ProcessBuilder stuff that everybody is doing themselves now.
> HOWEVER...
> Eclipse-based tools like JBDS use Eclipse APIs for launch and would not use the above launch() method.
> So, besides that launch method, look into adding some methods to give the necessary inputs to the Eclipse API be useful. So Eclipse-based tools don't ask it for the process but can still get a standard launch configuration.
> I'd only want to do that if those methods would return something generally understandable, but a String or List<String> for classpath, List<String>s for vm/program args, some representation that "-jar jboss-modules.jar" is the way to get the main class -- those all seem generic enough.
> Any "which VM" stuff is consider out of scope; choosing the VM is the responsibility of the tool. Options that are not universally supported across VMs and are those a function of VM choice, like whether to use -server, are also out of scope.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2275) StackOverflowError on DataSource resource injection
by Eduardo Martins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Eduardo Martins resolved WFLY-2275.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Bug
> StackOverflowError on DataSource resource injection
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2275
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2275
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Naming
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Thomas Diesler
> Assignee: Eduardo Martins
> Attachments: standalone-osgi.xml
>
>
> {code}
> @Resource(name="java:comp/DefaultDataSource")
> public DataSource ds;
> {code}
> leads to
> {code}
> 10:59:21,901 INFO [org.jboss.osgi.framework] (MSC service thread 1-3) JBOSGI011001: Bundle installed: resource-injection.jar:0.0.0
> 10:59:21,937 INFO [org.jboss.as.arquillian] (MSC service thread 1-3) Arquillian deployment detected: ArquillianConfig[service=jboss.arquillian.config."resource-injection.jar",unit=resource-injection.jar,tests=[org.jboss.test.osgi.example.resource.ResourceInjectionTestCase]]
> 10:59:21,993 ERROR [org.jboss.msc.service.fail] (MSC service thread 1-1) MSC000001: Failed to start service jboss.deployment.unit."resource-injection.jar".Activate: org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service jboss.deployment.unit."resource-injection.jar".Activate: Failed to start service
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1900) [jboss-msc-1.2.0.Beta2.jar:1.2.0.Beta2]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError
> at java.util.Vector.<init>(Vector.java:127) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at java.util.Vector.<init>(Vector.java:144) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at java.util.Vector.<init>(Vector.java:153) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at javax.naming.NameImpl.<init>(NameImpl.java:273) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at javax.naming.NameImpl.<init>(NameImpl.java:277) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at javax.naming.CompositeName.<init>(CompositeName.java:231) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> at org.jboss.as.naming.util.NameParser.parse(NameParser.java:49)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.parseName(NamingContext.java:496)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:188)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:184)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.deployment.ContextNames$BindInfo$1$1.getReference(ContextNames.java:302)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.ServiceBasedNamingStore.lookup(ServiceBasedNamingStore.java:140)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.ServiceBasedNamingStore.lookup(ServiceBasedNamingStore.java:81)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:202)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:188)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:184)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.deployment.ContextNames$BindInfo$1$1.getReference(ContextNames.java:302)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.ServiceBasedNamingStore.lookup(ServiceBasedNamingStore.java:140)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.ServiceBasedNamingStore.lookup(ServiceBasedNamingStore.java:81)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:202)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:188)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:184)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.deployment.ContextNames$BindInfo$1$1.getReference(ContextNames.java:302)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.ServiceBasedNamingStore.lookup(ServiceBasedNamingStore.java:140)
> at org.jboss.as.naming.ServiceBasedNamingStore.lookup(ServiceBasedNamingStore.java:81)
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 2 months