[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3102) EJB in WAR should inherit WAR's security domain
by Bill Burke (JIRA)
Bill Burke created WFLY-3102:
--------------------------------
Summary: EJB in WAR should inherit WAR's security domain
Key: WFLY-3102
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3102
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Web (Undertow)
Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
Reporter: Bill Burke
Assignee: Stuart Douglas
If you define an EJB within WEB-INF/classes it does not inherit the security domain from the WAR file and defaults to "other". Counter-intuitive, IMO. Not sure if it is easily fixable though
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2920) StackOverflowError when org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis is analyzing javax.ejb.EJBObject
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-2920:
-----------------------------------------------
Paul Gier <pgier(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1064644|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064644] from MODIFIED to ON_QA
> StackOverflowError when org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis is analyzing javax.ejb.EJBObject
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2920
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2920
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: IIOP
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Osamu Nagano
> Assignee: Stefan Guilhen
> Attachments: td.dump
>
>
> Depending on when a thread context switch happens, an IIOP enabled EJB fails to be deployed by throwing {{java.lang.StackOverflowError}}. Here is the stack trace from the attached thread dump.
> {code}
> "MSC service thread 1-7" prio=10 tid=0x00007f52e8001800 nid=0x4d12 at breakpoint[0x00007f534093f000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.WorkCacheManager.getAnalysis(WorkCacheManager.java:105)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis.getInterfaceAnalysis(InterfaceAnalysis.java:53)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.Util.getTypeIDLName(Util.java:104)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.ParameterAnalysis.<init>(ParameterAnalysis.java:50)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.OperationAnalysis.<init>(OperationAnalysis.java:91)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis.analyzeOperations(InterfaceAnalysis.java:116)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.ContainerAnalysis.doAnalyze(ContainerAnalysis.java:186)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis.doAnalyze(InterfaceAnalysis.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor3.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.WorkCacheManager.doTheWork(WorkCacheManager.java:177)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.WorkCacheManager.getAnalysis(WorkCacheManager.java:105)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis.getInterfaceAnalysis(InterfaceAnalysis.java:53)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.Util.getTypeIDLName(Util.java:104)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.ParameterAnalysis.<init>(ParameterAnalysis.java:50)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.OperationAnalysis.<init>(OperationAnalysis.java:91)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis.analyzeOperations(InterfaceAnalysis.java:116)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.ContainerAnalysis.doAnalyze(ContainerAnalysis.java:186)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis.doAnalyze(InterfaceAnalysis.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor3.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> ...
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.WorkCacheManager.doTheWork(WorkCacheManager.java:177)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.WorkCacheManager.getAnalysis(WorkCacheManager.java:105)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.InterfaceAnalysis.getInterfaceAnalysis(InterfaceAnalysis.java:53)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.Util.getTypeIDLName(Util.java:104)
> at org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.ParameterAnalysis.<init>(ParameterAnalysis.java:50)
> Locked ownable synchronizers:
> - <0x00000000f9698790> (a java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker)
> {code}
> The last part including {{Util.getTypeIDLName}} has been repeated as many as possible and the bottom of the stack has been lost. The same stack has been appeared in a different MSC service thread which is also executing an IIOP enabled EJB deployment.
> The customer identified an improper synchronization in {{org.jboss.as.jacorb.rmi.WorkCacheManager#getAnalysis()}}. It is reproducible by manually controlling a thread context switch using a debugger.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3073) MBeanServer.createMBean methods that take a classloader don't work
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-3073:
-----------------------------------------------
Paul Gier <pgier(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1073106|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073106] from MODIFIED to ON_QA
> MBeanServer.createMBean methods that take a classloader don't work
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3073
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3073
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JMX
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Stuart Douglas
> Assignee: Kabir Khan
> Fix For: 8.0.1.Final
>
>
> The MBeanServer.createMBean methods that take an "ObjectName loaderName" argument are completely broken in EAP 6.
> These methods call findDelegate to make sure there is already an existing MBean registered with the given name passed in for the new MBean, or else it throws an exception.
> This is obviously wrong, as there'd be no point in calling createMBean if it already existed.
> javax.management.InstanceNotFoundException: test:service=Test
> at org.jboss.as.jmx.PluggableMBeanServerImpl.findDelegate(PluggableMBeanServerImpl.java:1083)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx.PluggableMBeanServerImpl.createMBean(PluggableMBeanServerImpl.java:253)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3078) directory-grouping configuration is not getting persisted via CLI when no servers defined
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-3078:
-----------------------------------------------
Paul Gier <pgier(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1073715|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073715] from MODIFIED to ON_QA
> directory-grouping configuration is not getting persisted via CLI when no servers defined
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3078
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3078
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Environment: All Operating System
> Reporter: Jay Kumar SenSharma
> Assignee: Emanuel Muckenhuber
> Fix For: 8.0.1.Final
>
>
> - If none of the servers are defined in "host.xml" (means <servers></servers> empty tag is present) and if the user tries to run the following CLI command to change the "directory-grouping" to "by-type" then the value is not persisted in the configuration file (host.xml) and the <servers></servers> tag is also removed from the host.xml
> {code}
> /host=master/:write-attribute(name=directory-grouping,value=by-type)
> {code}
> - The value of "directory-grouping" is stored "in memory" so this change does not survive the host restart.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month