March 2017 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2361) [2.x] Upgrade XNIO to 3.4.3

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry commented on WFCORE-2361: ------------------------------------------ The merge commit for WFCORE-2361 references WFCORE-2116, but in the end it was about 2361. > [2.x] Upgrade XNIO to 3.4.3 > --------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2361 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2361 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Components: IO > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Frank Langelage > Fix For: 2.2.1.CR2 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2361) [2.x] Upgrade XNIO to 3.4.3

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

Brian Stansberry created WFCORE-2361: ---------------------------------------- Summary: [2.x] Upgrade XNIO to 3.4.3 Key: WFCORE-2361 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2361 Project: WildFly Core Issue Type: Component Upgrade Components: IO Reporter: Brian Stansberry Assignee: Frank Langelage Fix For: 2.2.1.CR2 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2126) Upgrade to Undertow 1.4.3+ in WFCORE 2.2.1 to resolve CVE-2016-4993

by Falko Modler (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Falko Modler commented on WFCORE-2126: -------------------------------------- Thanks everybody! > Upgrade to Undertow 1.4.3+ in WFCORE 2.2.1 to resolve CVE-2016-4993 > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2126 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2126 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Affects Versions: 2.2.1.CR1 > Reporter: Falko Modler > Assignee: Frank Langelage > Fix For: 2.2.1.CR2 > > > WFCORE-1688 upgraded Undertow to 1.4.0.Final which contains a rather serious sercurity vulnerability which was fixed in Undertow 1.4.3.Final (see UNDERTOW-827). > WildFly Swarm already builds on top of WFCORE 2.2.1.CR1 and will probably switch to 2.2.1.Final once it is released, so from my perspective it would be very sensible to upgrade to a corrected version of Undertow in the next CR (or Final) of WFCORE 2.2.1. > PS: WFCORE seems to build just fine (including tests) when upgrading the Undertow version to 1.4.7.Final in pom.xml. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2126) Upgrade to Undertow 1.4.3+ in WFCORE 2.2.1 to resolve CVE-2016-4993

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry reassigned WFCORE-2126: ---------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.2.1.CR2 Assignee: Frank Langelage Resolution: Done Thanks, Frank! > Upgrade to Undertow 1.4.3+ in WFCORE 2.2.1 to resolve CVE-2016-4993 > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2126 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2126 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Affects Versions: 2.2.1.CR1 > Reporter: Falko Modler > Assignee: Frank Langelage > Fix For: 2.2.1.CR2 > > > WFCORE-1688 upgraded Undertow to 1.4.0.Final which contains a rather serious sercurity vulnerability which was fixed in Undertow 1.4.3.Final (see UNDERTOW-827). > WildFly Swarm already builds on top of WFCORE 2.2.1.CR1 and will probably switch to 2.2.1.Final once it is released, so from my perspective it would be very sensible to upgrade to a corrected version of Undertow in the next CR (or Final) of WFCORE 2.2.1. > PS: WFCORE seems to build just fine (including tests) when upgrading the Undertow version to 1.4.7.Final in pom.xml. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-396) Look into whether READ_ONLY but not RUNTIME_ONLY domain server ops should be visible to users

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-396: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta8 (was: 3.0.0.Beta7) > Look into whether READ_ONLY but not RUNTIME_ONLY domain server ops should be visible to users > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-396 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-396 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Ken Wills > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta8 > > > Ops registered on a domain server without the RUNTIME_ONLY flag are hidden from users (e.g. in read-operation-names results etc) in order to not delude users into thinking they can do something like :write-attribute directly on a server (instead of modifying host or domain config elements.) > But shouldn't a READ_ONLY flag be sufficient as well? An op that only reads config should be valid. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-644) jboss-cli needs to support using PKCS11 (including FIPS mode) keystores/truststores

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-644: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta8 (was: 3.0.0.Beta7) > jboss-cli needs to support using PKCS11 (including FIPS mode) keystores/truststores > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-644 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-644 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: CLI > Reporter: Derek Horton > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta8 > > > The cli's SSL configuration should be expanded to support using PKCS11 keystores/truststores. Currently it does not appear to be possible to configure the keystore/truststore type in the jboss-cli.xml file. > This is problematic when the JVM is running in FIPS mode. > The cli throws the following exception on startup: > $ ./bin/jboss-cli.sh > org.jboss.as.cli.CliInitializationException: java.security.KeyManagementException: FIPS mode: only SunJSSE TrustManagers may be used > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextImpl.initSSLContext(CommandContextImpl.java:541) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextImpl.<init>(CommandContextImpl.java:291) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextFactoryImpl.newCommandContext(CommandContextFactoryImpl.java:76) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CliLauncher.initCommandContext(CliLauncher.java:294) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CliLauncher.main(CliLauncher.java:277) > at org.jboss.as.cli.CommandLineMain.main(CommandLineMain.java:34) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) > at org.jboss.modules.Module.run(Module.java:312) > at org.jboss.modules.Main.main(Main.java:460) > Caused by: java.security.KeyManagementException: FIPS mode: only SunJSSE TrustManagers may be used > at sun.security.ssl.SSLContextImpl.chooseTrustManager(SSLContextImpl.java:126) > at sun.security.ssl.SSLContextImpl.engineInit(SSLContextImpl.java:89) > at javax.net.ssl.SSLContext.init(SSLContext.java:283) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextImpl.initSSLContext(CommandContextImpl.java:537) > ... 11 more > It is possible to workaround the issue by setting the javax.net.ssl.keyStore / javax.net.ssl.trustStore system properties in the bin/jboss-cli.sh file: > JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=NONE -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStoreType=PKCS11" > JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=NONE -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStoreType=PKCS11 -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=imapassword" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-13) End users can call non-published management API operations

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-13: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta8 (was: 3.0.0.Beta7) > End users can call non-published management API operations > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-13 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Ladislav Thon > Labels: EAP > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta8 > > > It's not possible to call "non-published" operations (those that are not visible in the resource tree, e.g. {{describe}}) via JMX, while it's entirely possible to call them via CLI (e.g. {{/subsystem=security:describe}}) and other management interfaces. > The problem lies in the fact that {{ModelControllerMBeanHelper.invoke}} method checks {{if (!accessControl.isExecutableOperation(operationName))}} and the {{isExecutableOperation}} method assumes that the operation will be visible in the resource tree. In fact, there is a comment stating _should not happen_, but now we know that it indeed _can_ happen. > What's more, it gives a misleading error message. The {{isExecutableOperation}} returns {{false}} for unknown operations, which results in {{Not authorized to invoke operation}} message. Which is wrong in two different ways simultaneously: 1. the problem isn't authorization, but the fact that the operation can't be found; 2. the user (e.g. in the {{SuperUser}} role) _is_ authorized. > I'm considering this low priority, because 1. JMX is likely to be very rarely used to access the management interface, 2. hiding information isn't nearly as important as leaking them, 3. non-published operations aren't nearly as important as the published ones. It's worth a JIRA nevertheless. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1282) Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1282: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta8 (was: 3.0.0.Beta7) > Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1282 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security > Affects Versions: 1.0.2.Final > Environment: Oracle Java > Reporter: Martin Choma > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta8 > > Attachments: client_debug_eap6.log, client_debug_eap7.log, server-cert-key-ec.jks, server_debug_eap6.log, server_debug_eap7.log > > > User using these cipher suites / cipher name in EAP6 won't be able to use it in EAP7. > Setting as critical as these cipher suites, are considered for strong and widely used in my opinion. > In server log, error "no cipher suites in common" can be seen using -Djavax.net.debug=all. > Note, that analogous configuration in EAP6 works fine. > Issue can be seen on Oracle Java only, as on OpenJDK / IBM these suites are not provided by method getDefaultCipherSuites(). > Also is it possible to log "no cipher suites in common" and similar tls handshake errors without -Djavax.net.debug for better troubleshooting? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1351) FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1351: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta8 (was: 3.0.0.Beta7) > FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1351 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Remoting, Security > Reporter: Ondrej Kotek > Assignee: Ivo Studensky > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta8 > > Attachments: 1-no-createEndpoint-permission.stacktrace, 2-no-createXnioWorker-permission.stacktrace, 3-no-addConnectionProvider-permission.stacktrace, 4-no-accessDeclaredMembers-permission.stractrace, 5-no-suppressAccessChecks-permission.stracktrace > > > # Running _NestedRemoteContextTestCase_ (from WildFly _testsuite/integration/basic_) with security manager, like > {noformat} > ./integration-tests.sh -Dts.basic -Dts.noSmoke -Dtest=NestedRemoteContextTestCase -Dsecurity.manager > {noformat} > results in exception: > {noformat} > java.io.IOException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XNIO001001: No XNIO provider found > {noformat} > To make it work, permissions like following need to be added to _permissions.xml_ of _ejb.ear_: > {noformat} > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/xnio/nio/main/*", "read"), > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/marshalling/river/main/*", "read"), > new RemotingPermission("createEndpoint"), > new RuntimePermission("createXnioWorker"), > new RemotingPermission("addConnectionProvider"), > new RuntimePermission("modifyThread"), > new RuntimePermission("accessDeclaredMembers"), > new ReflectPermission("suppressAccessChecks") > {noformat} > which is very confusing. > Why do I need add seemingly unrelated permissions, like _FilePermission_ for XNIO and marshalling or _RuntimePermission_ for createXnioWorker? Such behavior should be fixed or properly documented. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1145) Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1145: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta8 (was: 3.0.0.Beta7) > Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1145 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Labels: affects_elytron > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta8 > > > Where an application server connects back to it's host controller in domain mode it used the same Remoting connector exposed possibly for native domain management access. > The problem with this is that as soon as any security restrictions are placed on the connector exposed by the host controller then the application servers require something to work with this - this is even though we are only ever talking about loopback communication between two process on the same machine. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira March 2017