May 2017 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBFORUMS-109) BBCode support for standalone version

by Ryszard Kozmik (JIRA)

BBCode support for standalone version ------------------------------------- Key: JBFORUMS-109 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBFORUMS-109 Project: JBoss Forums Issue Type: Task Components: Forum Enhancements Reporter: Ryszard Kozmik Fix For: 1.0.0 Alpha BBCode parser is now working only in portal environment. We need make it work as a standalone too. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

2 weeks, 3 days

4
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-457) Optimization: make threads return immediately if NAKACK has another active thread for the same sender

by Bela Ban (JIRA)

Optimization: make threads return immediately if NAKACK has another active thread for the same sender ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JGRP-457 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-457 Project: JGroups Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Bela Ban Assigned To: Bela Ban Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.5 In NAKACK, when a thread places a message for sender S into the NakReceiverWindow NRW, it subsequently acquires a lock on NRW (lock by sender) and removes as many messages as possible and passes them up. If many threads do this at the same time, all threads but one are blocked, and - when finally unblocked - usually return. This causes context switches and possibly cache flushing, so a better way would be to have the threads check whether another thread is already removing messages using a CAS operation *before* acquiring the lock. The effect should be that no threads will wait on the lock unnecessarily, and thus fewer context switches, and more threads available to the pool. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

2 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-776) Eliminate reference to "slot" from module configurations

by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Darran Lofthouse reassigned ELY-776: ------------------------------------ Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Eliminate reference to "slot" from module configurations > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ELY-776 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-776 > Project: WildFly Elytron > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Authentication Client > Reporter: David Lloyd > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 1.1.0.Beta15 > > > The final version of our client XSD should accept a name for modules but no slot. Instead, either the new name-only APIs should be used or a ModuleIdentifier created via that class's "fromString" method. Module slots are deprecated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

3 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBRULES-3445) DSL expander expands lines in /* */comment block

by Mario Fusco (JIRA)

Mario Fusco created JBRULES-3445: ------------------------------------ Summary: DSL expander expands lines in /* */comment block Key: JBRULES-3445 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3445 Project: Drools Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Mario Fusco Assignee: Mario Fusco When you comment some code in dslr file, the expander still tries to expand it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

7 months, 4 weeks

3
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2895) Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2895: ------------------------------------- Description: RuntimeCapability.fromBaseCapability results in a new RuntimeCapability that creates it's ServiceName by parsing the base capability's string name instead of using its existing ServiceName. This wastes memory since the strings end up being duplicated. Also RuntimeCapability should not create a ServiceName even if the cap has no serviceValueType. was: RuntimeCapability.fromBaseCapability results in a new RuntimeCapability that creates it's ServiceName by parsing the base capability's string name instead of using its existing ServiceName. This wastes memory since the strings end up being duplicated. As a side task look into why we create a ServiceName even if the cap has no serviceValueType. > Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2895 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2895 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > > RuntimeCapability.fromBaseCapability results in a new RuntimeCapability that creates it's ServiceName by parsing the base capability's string name instead of using its existing ServiceName. This wastes memory since the strings end up being duplicated. > Also RuntimeCapability should not create a ServiceName even if the cap has no serviceValueType. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2895) Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2895: ------------------------------------- Priority: Major (was: Minor) > Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2895 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2895 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > > RuntimeCapability.fromBaseCapability results in a new RuntimeCapability that creates it's ServiceName by parsing the base capability's string name instead of using its existing ServiceName. This wastes memory since the strings end up being duplicated. > As a side task look into why we create a ServiceName even if the cap has no serviceValueType. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2895) Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry reassigned WFCORE-2895: ---------------------------------------- Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2895 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2895 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Priority: Minor > > RuntimeCapability.fromBaseCapability results in a new RuntimeCapability that creates it's ServiceName by parsing the base capability's string name instead of using its existing ServiceName. This wastes memory since the strings end up being duplicated. > As a side task look into why we create a ServiceName even if the cap has no serviceValueType. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2895) Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

Brian Stansberry created WFCORE-2895: ---------------------------------------- Summary: Save memory in dynamic RuntimeCapability ServiceName creation Key: WFCORE-2895 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2895 Project: WildFly Core Issue Type: Enhancement Components: Domain Management Reporter: Brian Stansberry Priority: Minor RuntimeCapability.fromBaseCapability results in a new RuntimeCapability that creates it's ServiceName by parsing the base capability's string name instead of using its existing ServiceName. This wastes memory since the strings end up being duplicated. As a side task look into why we create a ServiceName even if the cap has no serviceValueType. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-8867) Legacy protocol property resource operations do not work for legacy protocols

by Jason Greene (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Jason Greene commented on WFLY-8867: ------------------------------------ Yes the management model is supposed to retain compatibility. The exception is a major release, and in that case it's ok if we have a migration operation. In the case of elytron we have addressed compatibility by preserving the old and new subsystems. > Legacy protocol property resource operations do not work for legacy protocols > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-8867 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8867 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Clustering > Affects Versions: 11.0.0.Alpha1 > Reporter: Paul Ferraro > Assignee: Paul Ferraro > Priority: Blocker > > QE Cc [~mnovak], [~okalman], [~mstyk], [~pkremens] > Cc [~kabirkhan], [~jason.greene] > See steps to reproduce. The question is, to what degree should CLI commands be backward compatible with 7.0? XML configurations pasted from 7.0 are OK in this case. > I previously thought these changes were OK (once documented in migration guide), but after discussion with the rest of the QE team, the most common opinion is that CLI commands should be 100% backward compatible with 7.0, which is not the case here. > [~bilge] since this is not stated anywhere I know, can you confirm that CLI commands in 7.1 need to be backward compatible with 7.0? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1475) Convert project to use i18n logging and exceptions

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on JGRP-1475: ----------------------------------------------- Vladimir Dosoudil <dosoudil(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1330729|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330729] from MODIFIED to ON_QA > Convert project to use i18n logging and exceptions > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JGRP-1475 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1475 > Project: JGroups > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: James Perkins > Assignee: Bela Ban > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.2 > > > As per [ANDIAMO-7|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ANDIAMO-7] all messages (logged and exceptions) need a unique id. This need to be done using JBoss Logging, [ANDIAMO-2|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ANDIAMO-2]. See [https://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-18453] for information on configuring the loggers and message bundles. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira May 2017