[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2786) Improve the composition operation output
by Filippe Spolti (JIRA)
Filippe Spolti created WFCORE-2786:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Improve the composition operation output
Key: WFCORE-2786
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2786
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: CLI
Reporter: Filippe Spolti
When you perform a composite operations with many commands the output will be enumerated in steps, like: step-1, step-2, ..., step-N.
I am not sure, but looks like the step-X correspond to the order of the commands sent in the request payload, example:
Payload:
{quote}
{
"address": [],
"json.pretty": 1,
"operation": "composite",
"steps": [
{
"name": "server-state",
"operation": "read-attribute"
},
{
"address": {
"deployment": "*"
},
"name": "status",
"operation": "read-attribute"
}
]
}
{quote}
Response:
{quote}
{
"outcome": "success",
"result": {
"step-1": {
"outcome": "success",
"result": "running"
},
"step-2": {
"outcome": "success",
"result": []
}
}
}
{quote}
If you have something the dynamically builds the composite payload, it is very hard to identify the output corresponding to each command in the payload.
It will be great if we can add a extra field in the response or change the steps name to its operation name, for example:
{quote}
{
"outcome": "success",
"result": {
"step-1": {
"operation-name": "server-state",
"outcome": "success",
"result": "running"
},
"step-2": {
"operation-name": "deployment-info",
"outcome": "success",
"result": []
}
}
}
{quote}
Or
{quote}
{
"outcome": "success",
"result": {
"server-state": {
"outcome": "success",
"result": "running"
},
"deployment-info": {
"outcome": "success",
"result": []
}
}
}
{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2483) There is missing CS integration with core management
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-2483:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta20
> There is missing CS integration with core management
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-2483
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2483
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Hynek Švábek
> Assignee: ehsavoie Hugonnet
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta20
>
>
> Priority is BLOCKER because this issue blocks RFE verification https://issues.jboss.org/browse/EAP7-538
> There must be credential store integration with core management as is mentioned in requirements of RFE.
> *management/security-realm*
> *management/security-realm/authentication/truststore* keystore-password
> *management/security-realm/server-identity/ssl* key-password and keystore-password
> *management/security-realm/server-identity/secret*
> *management/security-realm/authentication/users*
> But *security-realm* is deprecated, these resources have this description:
> {code}
> The security-realm configuration is deprecated and may be removed or moved in future versions.
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2784) Host controller should allow passing jvm parameters to servers
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry commented on WFCORE-2784:
------------------------------------------
The server vm config needs to come via the <jvm> element; we don't want it being controlled by the HC VM settings, as the server can be running a completely different JDK from the HC. And trying to intelligently mix the two sounds like a bug nest.
But being clever about ignoring stuff that we know won't work makes sense if we can. I forget how the permgen/metaspace stuff worked (i.e. how the HC knew the server's VM version) but it seems like it must have since it's the same kind of problem.
> Host controller should allow passing jvm parameters to servers
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-2784
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2784
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Tomaz Cerar
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
>
> It should be possible passing jvm options from host controller to servers runing in it.
> One such example is passing -ea to servers if passed to host controller
> other example is passing JDK9 specific parameters trough
> idea of implementation https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/2394/commits/d824be5c6d973e4...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
7 years, 8 months