[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-983) Bookinfo installation does not create route for productpage
by Filip Brychta (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Filip Brychta commented on SWSQE-983:
-------------------------------------
What does it mean it's not reproduces consistently? Does it mean that the route for bookinfo is created only sometimes? We need the route to be created always.
> Bookinfo installation does not create route for productpage
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-983
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-983
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: QE Task
> Reporter: Filip Brychta
> Assignee: Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: infrastructure
>
> The checker job is expecting bookinfo productpage to be available via route. The route is not created by bookinfo installation. We need the route to be able to check that product page is browsable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12764) Move to Bouncy Castle 1.62
by Brian Stansberry (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFLY-12764:
------------------------------------
Description: We need to revert WFLY-12662 as it has problems on JDK 13 [1] but we can move forward to 1.62 which doesn't have that problem or the CVE-2019-17359 that appeared in 1.63.
> Move to Bouncy Castle 1.62
> --------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-12764
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12764
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Component Upgrade
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Major
>
> We need to revert WFLY-12662 as it has problems on JDK 13 [1] but we can move forward to 1.62 which doesn't have that problem or the CVE-2019-17359 that appeared in 1.63.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12763) Separate the bean-validation subsystem from the 'cdi' Galleon layer
by Brian Stansberry (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFLY-12763:
------------------------------------
Issue Type: Task (was: Enhancement)
> Separate the bean-validation subsystem from the 'cdi' Galleon layer
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-12763
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12763
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Bean Validation, Build System
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Major
>
> When we created the 'cdi' layer we included bean-validation in it to avoid the need to create a separate layer. But we're starting to have basically a layer (or more) per subsystem, plus there are a number of layers that depend on 'cdi' and don't have a logical reason to bring along b-v for their use case (e.g. WFLY-12755). So I think we should break out b-v.
> Here are the current layers that depend on 'cdi':
> {code}
> $ git grep "layer name=\"cdi\""
> galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/cloud-profile/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi" optional="true"/>
> galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/ee-security/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi"/>
> galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/observability/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi"/>
> galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/open-tracing/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi"/>
> testsuite/test-feature-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/jaxrs-server/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi" optional="true"/>
> {code}
> For 'cloud-profile' and 'jaxrs-server' I would add b-v as a new optional dependency. I think most users who might be wanting b-v would be using one of those two, or, in the images, the 'cloud-server' descendent of 'cloud-profile', so they'll still get b-v.
> People directly depending on 'cdi' or expecting to get it via 'observability' or 'open-tracing' will need to adapt their config.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12763) Separate the bean-validation subsystem from the 'cdi' Galleon layer
by Brian Stansberry (Jira)
Brian Stansberry created WFLY-12763:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Separate the bean-validation subsystem from the 'cdi' Galleon layer
Key: WFLY-12763
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12763
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Bean Validation, Build System
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
When we created the 'cdi' layer we included bean-validation in it to avoid the need to create a separate layer. But we're starting to have basically a layer (or more) per subsystem, plus there are a number of layers that depend on 'cdi' and don't have a logical reason to bring along b-v for their use case (e.g. WFLY-12755). So I think we should break out b-v.
Here are the current layers that depend on 'cdi':
{code}
$ git grep "layer name=\"cdi\""
galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/cloud-profile/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi" optional="true"/>
galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/ee-security/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi"/>
galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/observability/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi"/>
galleon-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/open-tracing/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi"/>
testsuite/test-feature-pack/src/main/resources/layers/standalone/jaxrs-server/layer-spec.xml: <layer name="cdi" optional="true"/>
{code}
For 'cloud-profile' and 'jaxrs-server' I would add b-v as a new optional dependency. I think most users who might be wanting b-v would be using one of those two, or, in the images, the 'cloud-server' descendent of 'cloud-profile', so they'll still get b-v.
People directly depending on 'cdi' or expecting to get it via 'observability' or 'open-tracing' will need to adapt their config.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 6 months