December 2019 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1027) Overview Config Status Automate

by Hayk Hovsepyan (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Hayk Hovsepyan reassigned SWSQE-1027: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Hayk Hovsepyan > Overview Config Status Automate > ------------------------------- > > Key: SWSQE-1027 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-1027 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: QE Task > Reporter: Hayk Hovsepyan > Assignee: Hayk Hovsepyan > Priority: Major > Labels: automation > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1027) Overview Config Status Automate

by Hayk Hovsepyan (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Hayk Hovsepyan updated SWSQE-1027: ---------------------------------- Sprint: Kiali Sprint #29 > Overview Config Status Automate > ------------------------------- > > Key: SWSQE-1027 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-1027 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: QE Task > Reporter: Hayk Hovsepyan > Priority: Major > Labels: automation > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12842) MicroProfile Config properties are not taken into account by Jaeger client

by Sultan Zhantemirov (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Sultan Zhantemirov updated WFLY-12842: -------------------------------------- Attachment: MicroProfileOpenTracing10Test.war > MicroProfile Config properties are not taken into account by Jaeger client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-12842 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12842 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Bug > Components: MP OpenTracing > Affects Versions: 18.0.1.Final > Reporter: Sultan Zhantemirov > Assignee: Emmanuel Hugonnet > Priority: Critical > Attachments: MicroProfileOpenTracing10Test.war, microprofile-config.properties > > > I am trying to migrate tests from [Thorntail|https://github.com/rhoar-qe/thorntail-test-suite/tree/master/mi...] test suite, both MP OpenTracing 1.0 and 1.3. > Let's have a simple Arquillian test with Jaeger containerized in Docker and a WAR-archive with CDI enabled (_beans.xml_) and _META-INF/microprofile-config.properties_ included: > {noformat} > jaeger.sampler.param=1 > jaeger.sampler.type=const > {noformat} > But it seems that Jaeger instance running in Docker does not take into account the properties defined in WAR's _microprofile-config.properties_ file. It should trace every request to the deployed application but as far as I can see it does not. > Only manual instantiation and configuration of a Tracer object in @ApplicationScoped service leads to the expected behaviour. With @Inject 'ed tracer there is no success. > Regarding that let's imagine a user case: we have a deployment with _@Traced_ annotated classes/methods, CDI enabled (_beans.xml_) and _META-INF/microprofile-config.properties_ entries for Jaeger configuration. We don't want to modify existing classes (configuring existing tracer instance), we only want trace each REST request. > From reading the MP Config specs I expect Jaeger using my MP configuration properties (in case none of env or system variables JAEGER_* is set). Does it should work like this or am I missing something? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12835) HealthChecks in subdeployments are not registered

by Jeff Mesnil (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Jeff Mesnil updated WFLY-12835: ------------------------------- Summary: HealthChecks in subdeployments are not registered (was: HealthChecks in subdeploymnets are not registered) > HealthChecks in subdeployments are not registered > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-12835 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12835 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Bug > Components: MP Health > Affects Versions: 18.0.1.Final > Reporter: Ivan Straka > Assignee: Jeff Mesnil > Priority: Critical > > After EAR is deployed HealthChecks are not registered and not exposed under _/health_ endpoint. > EAR contains one WAR and one JAR. Both of them contains HealthChecks. > Test source: https://github.com/istraka/eap-microprofile-test-suite/blob/mp-health/mic... -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12842) MicroProfile Config properties are not taken into account by Jaeger client

by Sultan Zhantemirov (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Sultan Zhantemirov updated WFLY-12842: -------------------------------------- Attachment: microprofile-config.properties > MicroProfile Config properties are not taken into account by Jaeger client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-12842 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12842 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Bug > Components: MP OpenTracing > Affects Versions: 18.0.1.Final > Reporter: Sultan Zhantemirov > Assignee: Emmanuel Hugonnet > Priority: Critical > Attachments: microprofile-config.properties > > > I am trying to migrate tests from [Thorntail|https://github.com/rhoar-qe/thorntail-test-suite/tree/master/mi...] test suite, both MP OpenTracing 1.0 and 1.3. > Let's have a simple Arquillian test with Jaeger containerized in Docker and a WAR-archive with CDI enabled (_beans.xml_) and _META-INF/microprofile-config.properties_ included: > {noformat} > jaeger.sampler.param=1 > jaeger.sampler.type=const > {noformat} > But it seems that Jaeger instance running in Docker does not take into account the properties defined in WAR's _microprofile-config.properties_ file. It should trace every request to the deployed application but as far as I can see it does not. > Only manual instantiation and configuration of a Tracer object in @ApplicationScoped service leads to the expected behaviour. With @Inject 'ed tracer there is no success. > Regarding that let's imagine a user case: we have a deployment with _@Traced_ annotated classes/methods, CDI enabled (_beans.xml_) and _META-INF/microprofile-config.properties_ entries for Jaeger configuration. We don't want to modify existing classes (configuring existing tracer instance), we only want trace each REST request. > From reading the MP Config specs I expect Jaeger using my MP configuration properties (in case none of env or system variables JAEGER_* is set). Does it should work like this or am I missing something? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4623) Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model

by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Toshiya Kobayashi updated DROOLS-4623: -------------------------------------- Sprint: 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28), 2019 Week 47-49 (from Nov 18) (was: 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28)) > Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4623 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: executable model > Reporter: Mario Fusco > Assignee: Toshiya Kobayashi > Priority: Major > Labels: good-first-issue > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4623) Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model

by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Toshiya Kobayashi updated DROOLS-4623: -------------------------------------- Sprint: 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28) (was: 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28), 2019 Week 47-49 (from Nov 18)) > Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4623 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: executable model > Reporter: Mario Fusco > Assignee: Toshiya Kobayashi > Priority: Major > Labels: good-first-issue > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4623) Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model

by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Toshiya Kobayashi updated DROOLS-4623: -------------------------------------- Sprint: 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28), 2019 Week 47-49 (from Nov 18) (was: 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28)) > Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4623 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: executable model > Reporter: Mario Fusco > Assignee: Toshiya Kobayashi > Priority: Major > Labels: good-first-issue > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4623) Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model

by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Toshiya Kobayashi reassigned DROOLS-4623: ----------------------------------------- Assignee: Toshiya Kobayashi (was: Luca Molteni) > Using a negated constraint in a not pattern doesn't work with executable model > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4623 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4623 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: executable model > Reporter: Mario Fusco > Assignee: Toshiya Kobayashi > Priority: Major > Labels: good-first-issue > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1022) Overview page links

by Hayk Hovsepyan (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Hayk Hovsepyan commented on SWSQE-1022: --------------------------------------- https://github.com/Kiali-QE/kiali-qe-python/pull/222 > Overview page links > ------------------- > > Key: SWSQE-1022 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-1022 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: QE Task > Reporter: Hayk Hovsepyan > Assignee: Hayk Hovsepyan > Priority: Major > Labels: automation > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

5 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira December 2019