[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11848) EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
by Chao Wang (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Chao Wang updated WFLY-11848:
-----------------------------
Component/s: EJB
> EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11848
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11848
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Chao Wang
> Priority: Major
>
> EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
> EAP 7.2 is logging the ejb: JNDI binding 'ejb:ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello' which can be used by remote clients, but when the deployment is not an ear there is not an an AppName/ModuleName.
> the format is: ejb: appName / moduleName / distinctName / EJBName!EJBInterface
> For a deployment ejb-client.jar, the EJB it seeing appName == moduleName == ejb-client. But the way it has worked is if there is no sub deployment, then the appName is considered "", making the lookup: ejb:/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> If the ejb-client.jar was packaged in app.ear, then the lookup would be ejb:app/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> So all of that to say, there should be a / in the binding name when there is not an appName (ie not in an ear or not a subdeployment).
> {code}
> @Resource(lookup = "java:app/AppName")
> private String appName;
> @Resource(lookup = "java:module/ModuleName")
> private String moduleName;
> {code}
>
> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/EJB+invocations+from+a+remote+...
> {code}
> INFO [org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment] (MSC service thread 1-5) WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for session bean named 'Hello' in deployment unit 'deployment "ejb-client.jar"' are as follows:
> java:global/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:app/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:module/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:jboss/exported/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> ejb:ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:global/ejb-client/Hello
> java:app/ejb-client/Hello
> java:module/Hello
> {code}
> org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.EjbJndiBindingsDeploymentUnitProcessor
> {code}
> // log EJB's ejb:/ namespace binding
> final String ejbNamespaceBindingName = sessionBean.isStateful() ? ejbNamespaceBindingBaseName + "!" + viewClassName + "?stateful" : ejbNamespaceBindingBaseName + "!" + viewClassName;
> logBinding(jndiBindingsLogMessage, ejbNamespaceBindingName);
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11848) EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
by Chao Wang (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Chao Wang moved JBEAP-16551 to WFLY-11848:
------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
Key: WFLY-11848 (was: JBEAP-16551)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with loose statuses v1)
Fix Version/s: (was: 7.2.2.GA)
> EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11848
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11848
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Chao Wang
> Priority: Major
>
> EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
> EAP 7.2 is logging the ejb: JNDI binding 'ejb:ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello' which can be used by remote clients, but when the deployment is not an ear there is not an an AppName/ModuleName.
> the format is: ejb: appName / moduleName / distinctName / EJBName!EJBInterface
> For a deployment ejb-client.jar, the EJB it seeing appName == moduleName == ejb-client. But the way it has worked is if there is no sub deployment, then the appName is considered "", making the lookup: ejb:/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> If the ejb-client.jar was packaged in app.ear, then the lookup would be ejb:app/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> So all of that to say, there should be a / in the binding name when there is not an appName (ie not in an ear or not a subdeployment).
> {code}
> @Resource(lookup = "java:app/AppName")
> private String appName;
> @Resource(lookup = "java:module/ModuleName")
> private String moduleName;
> {code}
>
> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/EJB+invocations+from+a+remote+...
> {code}
> INFO [org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment] (MSC service thread 1-5) WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for session bean named 'Hello' in deployment unit 'deployment "ejb-client.jar"' are as follows:
> java:global/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:app/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:module/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:jboss/exported/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> ejb:ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:global/ejb-client/Hello
> java:app/ejb-client/Hello
> java:module/Hello
> {code}
> org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.EjbJndiBindingsDeploymentUnitProcessor
> {code}
> // log EJB's ejb:/ namespace binding
> final String ejbNamespaceBindingName = sessionBean.isStateful() ? ejbNamespaceBindingBaseName + "!" + viewClassName + "?stateful" : ejbNamespaceBindingBaseName + "!" + viewClassName;
> logBinding(jndiBindingsLogMessage, ejbNamespaceBindingName);
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11848) EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
by Chao Wang (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Chao Wang updated WFLY-11848:
-----------------------------
Affects Version/s: 16.0.0.Final
> EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11848
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11848
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Chao Wang
> Priority: Major
>
> EJB WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for ... ejb: is not correct when there is not an appName
> EAP 7.2 is logging the ejb: JNDI binding 'ejb:ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello' which can be used by remote clients, but when the deployment is not an ear there is not an an AppName/ModuleName.
> the format is: ejb: appName / moduleName / distinctName / EJBName!EJBInterface
> For a deployment ejb-client.jar, the EJB it seeing appName == moduleName == ejb-client. But the way it has worked is if there is no sub deployment, then the appName is considered "", making the lookup: ejb:/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> If the ejb-client.jar was packaged in app.ear, then the lookup would be ejb:app/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> So all of that to say, there should be a / in the binding name when there is not an appName (ie not in an ear or not a subdeployment).
> {code}
> @Resource(lookup = "java:app/AppName")
> private String appName;
> @Resource(lookup = "java:module/ModuleName")
> private String moduleName;
> {code}
>
> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/EJB+invocations+from+a+remote+...
> {code}
> INFO [org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment] (MSC service thread 1-5) WFLYEJB0473: JNDI bindings for session bean named 'Hello' in deployment unit 'deployment "ejb-client.jar"' are as follows:
> java:global/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:app/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:module/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:jboss/exported/ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> ejb:ejb-client/Hello!com.jboss.examples.ejb.Hello
> java:global/ejb-client/Hello
> java:app/ejb-client/Hello
> java:module/Hello
> {code}
> org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.EjbJndiBindingsDeploymentUnitProcessor
> {code}
> // log EJB's ejb:/ namespace binding
> final String ejbNamespaceBindingName = sessionBean.isStateful() ? ejbNamespaceBindingBaseName + "!" + viewClassName + "?stateful" : ejbNamespaceBindingBaseName + "!" + viewClassName;
> logBinding(jndiBindingsLogMessage, ejbNamespaceBindingName);
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11846) Deployment classloader leak on EE Concurrency managed threads
by Eduardo Martins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Eduardo Martins updated WFLY-11846:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: Screenshot 2019-03-13 at 20.21.19.png
> Deployment classloader leak on EE Concurrency managed threads
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11846
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11846
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Concurrency Utilities
> Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Eduardo Martins
> Assignee: Eduardo Martins
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: Screenshot 2019-03-13 at 20.21.19.png
>
>
> A followup to WFLY-11678, managed threads have another deployment CL leak, which happens due to parent thread having a reference to it in its AccessControlContext. When a thread is created it inherits parent's AccessControlContext.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11846) Deployment classloader leak on EE Concurrency managed threads
by Eduardo Martins (Jira)
Eduardo Martins created WFLY-11846:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Deployment classloader leak on EE Concurrency managed threads
Key: WFLY-11846
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11846
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Concurrency Utilities
Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Final
Reporter: Eduardo Martins
Assignee: Eduardo Martins
A followup to WFLY-11678, managed threads have another deployment CL leak, which happens due to parent thread having a reference to it in its AccessControlContext. When a thread is created it inherits parent's AccessControlContext.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 2 months