March 2019 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11818) wildfly-16.0.0.Final: "From address" is no more used as default from in email

by Wolfgang Mayer (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Wolfgang Mayer commented on WFLY-11818: --------------------------------------- I've now made 3 more tests using mail example from the Quickstarts. Test1: message.setFrom(new InternetAddress(from)); Result: mail.user: Null user.name: Correct message.getFrom(): Correct Test2: message.setFrom(new InternetAddress()); Result: mail.user: Null user.name: Correct message.getFrom(): Null Test3: no message.setFrom() (This approach was used in WildFly 15) Result: mail.user: Null user.name: Correct message.getFrom(): NullPointerException > wildfly-16.0.0.Final: "From address" is no more used as default from in email > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-11818 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11818 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Mail > Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Final > Environment: mvn -v > Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3; 2018-10-24T20:41:47+02:00) > Maven home: /apps/apache-maven-3.6.0 > Java version: 11.0.2, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: /usr/java/jdk-11.0.2 > Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "linux", version: "4.12.14-lp150.12.48-default", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" > Reporter: Wolfgang Mayer > Assignee: Tomaz Cerar > Priority: Major > > As mentioned in the Help (description) of 'Mail Session' configuration: > From: *From address that is used as default from, if not set when sending* > Apparently this is not the case anymore in wildfly-16.0.0.Final. > For example I made a test with quickstart-16.0/mail/. > When omitting the line > *message.setFrom(new InternetAddress(from));* > Sending mail fails with: > com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPSendFailedException: 554-Transaction failed > 554 Unauthorized sender address. > I have the same issue when replacing the line above with > message.setFrom(new InternetAddress()); > I am pretty sure that this is working in wildfly-15 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1603) Implement proper container update in case Kie scanner finds new artifact

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari reassigned DROOLS-1603: -------------------------------------- Assignee: Maciej Swiderski (was: Matteo Mortari) > Implement proper container update in case Kie scanner finds new artifact > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: DROOLS-1603 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1603 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: kie server > Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Beta2 > Reporter: Karel Suta > Assignee: Maciej Swiderski > Priority: Major > Labels: reported-by-qe > > Currently Kie server can't properly detect that Kie scanner updated Kie container release id. This leads to temporary solutions like [1] and errors like [2]. > Now as Kie scanner supports listeners [3] Kie server should properly integrate with Kie scanner, reacting on container updates. > [1] https://github.com/kiegroup/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/c3437e4ce2a4b295d... > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-6048 > [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1565 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2988) Question Mark should always be leading in qualified names

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari updated DROOLS-2988: ----------------------------------- Story Points: 5 > Question Mark should always be leading in qualified names > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-2988 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2988 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Edoardo Vacchi > Assignee: Matteo Mortari > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-core > > The QuestionMark identifier is recognized as part of a qualified name, but it should only be admitted as the first fragment. Currently we are not accounting for edge cases such as `foo.?.bar`. This should be probably reported as a syntax error, as it does not make any sense, but we can ignore it for now. > Relevant lines: > https://github.com/kiegroup/drools/blob/c82693e41ce4713ca466fb6947e4a046e... > Memo: Recognition of `? ` is done via a global variable. We should rather refactor this as to carry the information correctly in a DirectCompilerResult. This was deemed a bit complicated because of the level of nesting of tree nodes. We can do this when/if we refactor the compiler to use a proper AST -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1481) Validate function signature at compile time and improve error message

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari updated DROOLS-1481: ----------------------------------- Story Points: 8 > Validate function signature at compile time and improve error message > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1481 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1481 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: dmn engine > Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta7 > Reporter: Edson Tirelli > Assignee: Matteo Mortari > Priority: Major > > Function signatures as of now are only validated in runtime. We can improve it to add static validation as well. For instance, in the expression: > {code}"$"+ (if Payment < 1000 then string(Payment) else (substring(string(Payment),1,1) + "," + substring(string(decimal(Payment,2),2)))){code} > In runtime I get: > {quote}Unable to find function 'string( class java.math.BigDecimal, class java.math.BigDecimal )'{quote} > Because of: > {code}...string(decimal(Payment,2),2)...{code} > Instead of (see the misplaced parenthesis): > {code}...string(decimal(Payment,2)),2...{code} > I think we can also improve the error message to say: > {quote}Unable to find function 'string( number, number )'{quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2513) Add support for embedded test execution

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari commented on DROOLS-2513: ---------------------------------------- Estimated as 5 as even on TCK test value deseriaization rely on DMN typeref which may not always be available. > Add support for embedded test execution > --------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-2513 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2513 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: dmn engine > Affects Versions: 7.7.0.Final > Reporter: Edson Tirelli > Assignee: Matteo Mortari > Priority: Major > > TCK test cases can be embedded in the DMN model under the extension elements (e.g., see Trisotech generated models). > Add a public API to allow execution of embedded test cases. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1400) Comparison of DRL changes should not consider comments during incremental compilation

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari reassigned DROOLS-1400: -------------------------------------- Assignee: Luca Molteni (was: Matteo Mortari) > Comparison of DRL changes should not consider comments during incremental compilation > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1400 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1400 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core engine > Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta5 > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Luca Molteni > Priority: Minor > > Same as [DROOLS-1399] but concerning comments; in full below: > During incremental compilation the equivalent DRL file contains only a modification +within a comment+. Currently, this triggers the incremental compilation to rebuild all the resources associated in that DRL file anyway. Consequently, a rule in that DRL file might be actually UNchanged; but following the explanation above, it will match and fire again, like it's a new/modified rule. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1400) Comparison of DRL changes should not consider comments during incremental compilation

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari commented on DROOLS-1400: ---------------------------------------- Reassigning to [~volothamp] as I believe more related to his current activities ;) > Comparison of DRL changes should not consider comments during incremental compilation > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1400 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1400 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core engine > Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta5 > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Luca Molteni > Priority: Minor > > Same as [DROOLS-1399] but concerning comments; in full below: > During incremental compilation the equivalent DRL file contains only a modification +within a comment+. Currently, this triggers the incremental compilation to rebuild all the resources associated in that DRL file anyway. Consequently, a rule in that DRL file might be actually UNchanged; but following the explanation above, it will match and fire again, like it's a new/modified rule. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2513) Add support for embedded test execution

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari updated DROOLS-2513: ----------------------------------- Story Points: 5 > Add support for embedded test execution > --------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-2513 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2513 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: dmn engine > Affects Versions: 7.7.0.Final > Reporter: Edson Tirelli > Assignee: Matteo Mortari > Priority: Major > > TCK test cases can be embedded in the DMN model under the extension elements (e.g., see Trisotech generated models). > Add a public API to allow execution of embedded test cases. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1705) Audit remaining Class.forName in static factory methods

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari commented on DROOLS-1705: ---------------------------------------- [~evacchi] reassigning to you as I believe more relevant to your current Quarkus-related activities ;) > Audit remaining Class.forName in static factory methods > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1705 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1705 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Components: core engine > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Edoardo Vacchi > Priority: Minor > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1609) Augment FEEL AST node at compilation with return type

by Matteo Mortari (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matteo Mortari updated DROOLS-1609: ----------------------------------- Story Points: 8 > Augment FEEL AST node at compilation with return type > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1609 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1609 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: dmn engine > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Matteo Mortari > Priority: Minor > > This is needed so to be able to determine the result of a boxed function at compile time, in turn to be able at compile time to determine a valid compilation without error of a BKM for instance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira March 2019