[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JASSIST-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
Andrew Dinn commented on JASSIST-96:
------------------------------------
I'm happy about this being published to Maven central but it is Chiba who needs to
confirm that.
Regarding the license: I specifed LGPL 2.1 as the license in the pom because I understood
that to be the license under which JBoss ships javassist as part of AS. The license
details available via in the Readme (in the root of the distribution) make provision for
this form of redistribution.
This may not be appropriate if we install the release in Maven central since we are not
then distributing it.
Also, if we do continue to distribute from our repo then the license terms may need
revisiting. It is not clear to me whether we have to explicitly remove the MPL details as
included by Chiba and replace them with a reference to the LGPL or whether we are covered
by the fact that we have specified the LGPL in the pom. Perhaps someone else (Chiba and/or
a lawyer) can comment?
Publish javassist to Maven central
----------------------------------
Key: JASSIST-96
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JASSIST-96
Project: Javassist
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Pete Muir
It would be nice if Javassist were published to Maven central regularly
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira