[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6902) Undertow mod_cluster: Multiinterface box: Manager-Address always contains hostname

Undertow mod_cluster: Multiinterface box: Manager-Address always contains hostname ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WFLY-6902 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6902 Project: WildFly Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 10.1.0.CR1 Reporter: Michal Karm Babacek Assignee: Stuart Douglas h3. On a multi-interface Windows box Even though the EAP balancer instance is bound to an IP address, 10.40.128.61 in this case: {code} <interfaces> <interface name="management"> <inet-address value="10.40.128.61"/> </interface> <interface name="public"> <inet-address value="10.40.128.61"/> </interface> </interfaces> {code}, it advertises a hostname as its Manager-Address. The receiving worker node then might have troubles calling the balancer if it translates the hostname to a different IP address (interface on the same box...): Balancer: {code} 2016-04-28 18:00:00,232 DEBUG [io.undertow] (default I/O-2) UT005040: Gonna send payload: HTTP/1.0 200 OK Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:00:00 -0700 Sequence: 11 Digest: d356f44c4372f38eeb064e214b61b3e0 Server: 73a81e63-9938-42ce-bd17-92e2aeef3991 X-Manager-Address: atomic-0.yada.bla.bla.redhat.com:8847 X-Manager-Url: / X-Manager-Protocol: https X-Manager-Host: atomic-0.yada.bla.bla.redhat.com {code} Worker: {code} MODCLUSTER000043: Failed to send INFO command to atomic-0.yada.bla.bla.redhat.com/169.254.47.37:8847: Connection refused: connect {code} i.e. instead of using 10.40.128.61 the balancer is bound to, worker tries to call anotehr interface and fails. Suggestion: If user explicitly uses IP address instead of a hostname, it should be either honoured or at least explicitly configurable for the Manager-Address attribute. IMHO.