[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Richard Achmatowicz commented on AS7-4509:
------------------------------------------
Hmm, on the one hand, in
RFC4007(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4007.txt), they indicate on
page 8 that:
{noformat}
As well as initially assigning zone indices, as specified above, an
implementation should automatically select a default zone for each
scope for which there is more than one choice, to be used whenever an
address is specified without a zone index (or with a zone index of
zero). For instance, in the example shown in Figure 2, the
implementation might automatically select intf2 and link2 as the
default zones for each of those two scopes. (One possible selection
algorithm is to choose the first zone that includes an interface
other than the loopback interface as the default for each scope.) A
means must also be provided to assign the default zone for a scope
manually, overriding any automatic assignment.
{noformat}
So I would expect that coding <link-local-address> or <link-local-address>%0
would pick up that default zoneid.
On the other hand, on my machine ping6:
- doesn't allow me to make use of a link-local address without a zone id
{noformat}
[nrla@lenovo ~]$ ping6 fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9
connect: Invalid argument
[nrla@lenovo ~]$ ping6 -I eth0 fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9
PING fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9(fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9) from fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b8
eth0: 56 data bytes
...
^C
--- fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time 4000ms
[nrla@lenovo ~]$ ping6 fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9%2
PING fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9%2(fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9) 56 data bytes
...
^C
--- fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9%2 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time 4000ms
{noformat}
- doesn't accept the %0 usage
{noformat}
[nrla@lenovo ~]$ ping6 fe80::f2de:f1ff:fe40:75b9%0
connect: Invalid argument
{noformat}
CLONE - Server start without any problem or message even
specification of IP address(-s) is ambiguous
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4509
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4509
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Pavel Janousek
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Labels: eap6_ipv6
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
In IPv6 world it is possible if two or more network interfaces has the same IPv6 address.
It is legally and true especially in Link-local address scope.
So if we configure 2 or more network interfaces with a manually defined IPv6 address
(link-local prefix fe80::/10 is the best) and try to start-up EAP and do this
like:{code}./standalone.sh -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=false -b=fe80::200:ff:fe00:5
-bmanagement=fe80::200:ff:fe00:5 -c standalone-full.xml{code}there isn't *any* warning
message reported, nor any notice that this specification is ambiguous.
I prefer in a such case to reject this specification as ambiguous (especially for the
case - there is a risk of accidentally open EAP instance to the world), refuse start with
error message and immediately exit. Although this situation has its roots in administrator
mistake, it can became very hard risk of customer's data when it will be overseen for
awhile. (*)
(*) some case-studies report blind clear MS Windows station is attacked up to 10 minutes
from it boot when is directly connected to unsecure Internet network without any firewall
etc... my own personal experience is at least the same... - yes, it is dangerous to work
in a such environment and situation on a Internet directly connected server host, but an
admins really works like that...
Anyway - the missed part of specification needed for correct set-up in this case is *zone
id* identifier. When it is supplied, star-up is correct.
Although this is really +edge case+ of using EAP and its configuration, it can
accidentally expose customer's sensitive data so we should take it very carefully.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira