]
Emanuel Muckenhuber updated JBAS-5332:
--------------------------------------
Attachment: patch.txt
Container artifacts should have symmetric lifecycles
----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-5332
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5332
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: EJB2
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.2.2.GA, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta4
Reporter: Adrian Brock
Assignee: Emanuel Muckenhuber
Fix For: JBossAS-5.0.1.CR1
Attachments: patch.txt
The container artifacts i.e. [Session|Entity|MessageDriven]Container, interceptors,
cache, pool, ProxyBindings
should have symmetric create/start/stop/destroy methods.
e.g. The MessageDrivenContainer does this in destroy
// Destroy container invoker
for (Iterator it = proxyFactories.keySet().iterator(); it.hasNext();)
{
String invokerBinding = (String) it.next();
EJBProxyFactory ci = (EJBProxyFactory) proxyFactories.get(invokerBinding);
ci.destroy();
ci.setContainer(null);
try
{
ObjectName containerName = super.getJmxName();
Hashtable props = containerName.getKeyPropertyList();
props.put("plugin", "invoker");
props.put("binding", invokerBinding);
ObjectName invokerName = new ObjectName(containerName.getDomain(),
props);
server.unregisterMBean(invokerName);
}
catch(Throwable ignore)
{
}
}
The setContainer(null) is wrong since it isn't the one that sets the container in
create()
that is done by EjbModule in its createService() method
In this case, the fix is to either move the setting of container to
MessageDrivenContainer::createService()
or move the nulling of the container to EjbModule::destroyService()
Other artifacts also need checking and fixing with tests writing to validate that each
container can
go through a stop/destroy/create/start lifecycle and still function correctly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: