[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBMETA-171) jboss_4_2.dtd differs from the one found in Branch_4_2
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMETA-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBMETA-171:
------------------------------------------
Meaningful difference is between the ordering of proxy-factory-config:
Branch_4_2
<!ELEMENT proxy-factory-config (client-interceptors? , activation-config? ,
endpoint-interceptors? ,
web-class-loader? , JMSProviderAdapterJNDI? , ServerSessionPoolFactoryJNDI? ,
metadata (the same in both jboss_4_2.dtd and jboss_5_0.dtd)
<!ELEMENT proxy-factory-config (client-interceptors?, endpoint-interceptors? ,
web-class-loader? ,
activation-config?, JMSProviderAdapterJNDI? , ServerSessionPoolFactoryJNDI? ,
I don't know for which reason. In Java proxy-factory-config is represented as
org.w3c.dom.Element (so, no ordering is defined in Java binding). I am thinking of
changing it back to the ordering as in Branch_4_2.
Other changes are added comments for the child elements of cluster-config.
jboss_4_2.dtd differs from the one found in Branch_4_2
------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBMETA-171
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMETA-171
Project: JBoss Metadata
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Reporter: Dimitris Andreadis
Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky
Which is correct?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira