[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira....
]
Andrew Lee Rubinger updated EJBTHREE-1650:
------------------------------------------
Summary: Need EL-replacement within @RemoteBinding.clientBindUrl so connect
addresses are not hardcoded (was: Can't specify 'jboss.bind.address' for
remoting bind (clientBindUrl= 0.0.0.0) with JBoss5.0.0.GA)
Issue Type: Feature Request (was: Bug)
Priority: Major (was: Critical)
Need EL-replacement within @RemoteBinding.clientBindUrl so connect
addresses are not hardcoded
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: EJBTHREE-1650
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1650
Project: EJB 3.0
Issue Type: Feature Request
Environment: CentOS release 5 (Final)
Reporter: amar slimane
Assignee: Andrew Lee Rubinger
With JBoss5.0.0.Beta4, it's possible to specify 'jboss.bind.address' as a
remoting binding with setting 'clientBindUrl' to 0.0.0.0 :
@RemoteBindings({
@RemoteBinding( clientBindUrl="socket://3873:", jndiBinding =
"jndiBind1") ,
@RemoteBinding( clientBindUrl="sslsocket://3843:", jndiBinding =
"jndiBind2") ,
@RemoteBinding(
clientBindUrl="https://0.0.0.0:8443/servlet-invoker/SSLServerInvokerServlet",
jndiBinding = "jndiBind3") ,
})
This don't work with JBoss5.0.0.GA and it's impossible to have multiple remoting
binds for an EJB.
It's critical for our application and we don't know if there is a workaround.
This issue is probably relative to
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1610
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira